1990
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.175.2.2326482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the susceptibility effect on the phase images of a simple gradient echo.

Abstract: The phase shifts of a simple gradient echo (fast low-angle shot) were correlated with the local change in resonance frequency due to the differences in susceptibility among tissues (susceptibility effect). Susceptibility effects were considered theoretically, and the phase shifts for spherical and cylindrical configurations were calculated. A 1.5-T magnetic resonance unit and phantoms filled with solutions of copper chloride in water were used to obtain the phase images. The phase shifts of the simple gradient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The screening constant uis of the molecules in interaction with its neighbors relates the local field with the macroscopic field. An approximated relation between these fields is given by (15) where T(r) is the temperature at position r inside the object. Hydrogen bonds distort the electronic configuration of the molecules (16) resulting in a less effective electronic screening.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screening constant uis of the molecules in interaction with its neighbors relates the local field with the macroscopic field. An approximated relation between these fields is given by (15) where T(r) is the temperature at position r inside the object. Hydrogen bonds distort the electronic configuration of the molecules (16) resulting in a less effective electronic screening.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, up to an order of magnitude phase gap change was measured between one PKAN patient and an age-matched healthy volunteer (see Table 3). Assuming that phase gap differences scale linearly with iron concentration (33) and taking into account published data for iron concentration in the GP of healthy volunteers (3), we estimate that up to 2 mg Fe/g ww accumulates in the GP of these patients. Our pilot study has certain limitations, and to prove that phase could indeed be a useful index of PKAN progression a number of necessary developmental steps are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. We used phase gap measurements corresponding to a minimum and maximum phase (defined as a phase gap) as a metrics that, we believe, reflects the level of iron concentration in GP (23,33). The results of these measurements averaged for left and right GP in PKAN patients and results of phase profile measurements in a healthy volunteer are summarized in Table 3.…”
Section: Phase Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distortion is proportional to the eld error and inversely proportional to the strengths of the applied gradients L udeke et al 1985; Ericsson et al 1988;Chang and Fitzpatrick 1992;Bakker et al 1992;O'Donnell and Edelstein 1985. In gradient e c ho imaging, local disturbances of B 0 cause, apart from the geometric e ects mentioned above, severe intensity losses due to uncompensated intravoxel phase dispersion, the so called T 2 -e ect Young et al 1989. In the past few years several studies have been undertaken to establish the experimental conditions which determine susceptibility artifacts in spin echo and gradient echo imaging and to provide a theoretical basis for the observed phenomena Young et al 1988;Haacke et al 1989;Yamada et al 1990;Cho and Ro 1992;Summers et al 1986. In previous work Bakker et al 1993 we proposed a method for simulation of susceptibility artifacts, which follows the actual sequence of events in an imaging experiment and deals with the e ects of error elds in the time domain k-space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a patient in a MRI scanner leads to static magnetic eld inhomogeneity, since the magnetic eld is perturbed as the consequence of the di erence in susceptibility b e t ween the patient and the surrounding air. The severity of the eld perturbations outside the body depends on the susceptibility di erence with air, the shape of the body and the orientation of the body with respect to the applied magnetic eld Cox et al 1986;Young et al 1987;Yamada et al 1990;Yamada et al 1992;Mosher and Smith 1991;Bhagwandien et al 1994. For better understanding of the objectinduced image distortions we developed a numerical technique for calculating the magnetic eld for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%