2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00202-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the suitability of a patient data management system for ICUs on a general ward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ballermann et al [23] Moderate a -Ballermann et al [24] Strong -Benson et al [25] Moderate b, c Bosman et al [26] Strong -Bürkle et al [17] Weak a,d -De Mul et al [27] Strong De Reus [18] Weak e ,f,g ,b, c Doulgas et al [28] Strong Donati et al [29] Strong Strong Eden et al [30] Strong Strong Eden et al [31] Strong Ehrenfeld et al [32] Strong Eslami et al [33] Strong -Fraenkel et al [34] Strong -Fretschner et al [22] Weak h ,d Moderate i, e, g,b Junger et al [19] Weak h ,d Weak i ,e ,g, b,c Lipp and Williams [20] Weak i ,f ,g, b,c Menke et al [21] Weak a ,h -Meyfroidt et al [35] Strong -Nelwan et al [36] Strong Saarinen and Aho [37] Strong -Van Vliet [38] Moderate i, e, f,c Wong et al [39] Strong - remained for the full text review. Following analysis of the full text articles, 23 articles were considered relevant for the systematic literature review.…”
Section: Publication Quality Assessment Ratings Quantitative and Qualmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ballermann et al [23] Moderate a -Ballermann et al [24] Strong -Benson et al [25] Moderate b, c Bosman et al [26] Strong -Bürkle et al [17] Weak a,d -De Mul et al [27] Strong De Reus [18] Weak e ,f,g ,b, c Doulgas et al [28] Strong Donati et al [29] Strong Strong Eden et al [30] Strong Strong Eden et al [31] Strong Ehrenfeld et al [32] Strong Eslami et al [33] Strong -Fraenkel et al [34] Strong -Fretschner et al [22] Weak h ,d Moderate i, e, g,b Junger et al [19] Weak h ,d Weak i ,e ,g, b,c Lipp and Williams [20] Weak i ,f ,g, b,c Menke et al [21] Weak a ,h -Meyfroidt et al [35] Strong -Nelwan et al [36] Strong Saarinen and Aho [37] Strong -Van Vliet [38] Moderate i, e, f,c Wong et al [39] Strong - remained for the full text review. Following analysis of the full text articles, 23 articles were considered relevant for the systematic literature review.…”
Section: Publication Quality Assessment Ratings Quantitative and Qualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the quality assessment phase, five articles received a weak rating and were eliminated [17][18][19][20][21]. One article received a weak rating for the quantitative or qualitative component, but a moderate to strong rating for their descriptive component; Ballermann et al [23] Pre-post implementation x Ballermann et al [24] Pre-post implementation x Benson et al [25] x Bosman et al [26] Randomized controlled trial x De Mul et al [27] x Donati et al [29] Observational x x x Douglas et al [28] x Eden et al [30] Pre-post implementation x x x Eden et al [31] Pre-post implementation x Ehrenfel et al [32] Pre-post implementation x Eslami et al [33] Pre-post implementation x Fraenkel et al [34] Pre-post implementation x x Fretschner et al [22] x Meyfroidt et al [35] Pre-post implementation x Nelwan et al 2007 [36] x Saarinen and Aho [37] Pre-post implementation x Van Vliet [38] x Wong et al [39] Pre-post implementation x hence only their descriptive information was included [22].…”
Section: Publication Quality Assessment Ratings Quantitative and Qualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical case of such scenarios is the medical signals generated in ICU of hospitals. Currently, the most advanced ICU systems as generally accepted, the HP CareVue [23] , ICU data [24] and VA quantitative sentinel system [9] , all use traditional databases to store biomedical signals. Due to storage limitation, they can only sample the data with a rather long interval (e.g., twice per hour).…”
Section: Data Stream Management Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, none of them can analyze the stream data or detect variations. The tasks of variation management are completed manually by nurses [24] , the manner that is error-prone and brings heavy workload as well as high expense.…”
Section: Data Stream Management Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, intensive care needs to be increased with a prospect of an aging population and socioeconomic factors influencing health intervention, and there are some problems in the ICUs, it is essential to resolve (1, 2, 3); Such as: Beds and skilled manpower shortcoming, Exorbitant cost of treatment, High rates of mortality, Severe Nosocomial infections, High LOS, Low compliace with standards, Low quality of care and improvements, Epidemic of medical and medication errors, Poor coordination of intensive care team, and the lack of information required for clinical and managerial decisions (4, 5, 6). Also, Some problems must be considered such as automatic scoring systems failure to predict disease severity and mortality, real time documentation of clinical data, Inefficiency of integrated clinical alerts, Significant clinical workflow interruptions, and Resource constraints (7, 8, 9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%