2018
DOI: 10.1080/02723646.2018.1472984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the SNOWPACK model’s metamorphism and microstructure in Canada: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, percolation is also affected by snow grains, which is hard to evaluate. A previous work in our group (Madore et al, 2018) suggested that the optical snow grain size bias is a function of the dominant metamorphic process in place. In our case, an overestimation of the optical grain size was measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, percolation is also affected by snow grains, which is hard to evaluate. A previous work in our group (Madore et al, 2018) suggested that the optical snow grain size bias is a function of the dominant metamorphic process in place. In our case, an overestimation of the optical grain size was measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Overall, this paper proposes a configuration of the SNOWPACK model well adapted to the conditions of Glacier National Park, leading to accurate melt and percolation timing, as well as a good correlation with wet snow avalanche cycles. Future work will include further empirical development of new snow density parameterization as well as further investigation into grain size and type biases in the model following the approach of Madore et al (2018), in order to propose a snow grain correction function adapted to our study region. These results are relevant for the ongoing development of the SNOWPACK model as well as for the snow modeling community that makes use of similar thermodynamic snow models for climate scenarios, snow mass balance studies, surface-atmosphere feedback, hydrological processes, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations