2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the significance of pseudomyxoma peritonei patients based on the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the overall survival in our study is in line with those of previous similar studies (Table 3) (11,13,14,17,21). Overall survival correlated well with PSOGI class (Figure 2).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, the overall survival in our study is in line with those of previous similar studies (Table 3) (11,13,14,17,21). Overall survival correlated well with PSOGI class (Figure 2).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Most patients (65%) had no (PSS 0) or limited (PSS 1) surgery prior to their CRS + HIPEC. The median PCI score was 25 [interquartile range (IQR), [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. 210 patients (94%) were treated with CRS + HIPEC, and a CC score of 0/1 was achieved in 184 (88%) of these procedures.…”
Section: Demographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 120 males and 78 females, the mean age was 58 ± 11 years. The median duration from tumor markers detection to CRS was 7 (5,10) days. There were 68 participants underwent radical surgery, while 130 underwent debulking surgery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete cytoreduction surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were the recommended standard treatment for PMP [4] . The extent of peritoneal involvement was quanti ed by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) [5] , which is the surgical variable commonly used to determine the feasibility of tumor reduction [6] . PCI is a rather well established scoring system with scores from 0 to 39 and also been employed to re ect tumor burden in PMP patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high rate of surgical morbidity, candidate patients should be selected carefully. Lee et al (8) reported that determining the extent of the clinical pathological classification and CC score is crucial to assessing survival outcomes. These findings should be considered when explaining to patients before surgery the benefits and risks of CRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%