Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COM 2015
DOI: 10.7712/120115.3538.473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Seismic Vulnerability of the “Ancien Hôpital De Sion” Using Applied Element Modelling (Aem) and Local Mechanism Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting damage distribution is illustrated in Figure 7b in comparison to the one obtained in the case with slabs, showing higher number of involved walls, evidencing the necessity of an adequate modelling of the floors and their influence in the seismic response of the structure In Figure 8, the damage distributions obtained from the model with large mesh division and the model with refined mesh division are reported, as an example, for the Eastern walls of the building. The comparison showed that the refined model is able to provide a very precise cracking distribution and a higher damage level, mainly due to the advantage of having a division higher than one in the direction of the wall's thickness, but with a sensibly higher computational cost [19]. For the first three modes, Figure 9 shows the variation of the periods' values for the two mesh divisions due to the damage progression during the non-linear analysis.…”
Section: Non-linear Dynamic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting damage distribution is illustrated in Figure 7b in comparison to the one obtained in the case with slabs, showing higher number of involved walls, evidencing the necessity of an adequate modelling of the floors and their influence in the seismic response of the structure In Figure 8, the damage distributions obtained from the model with large mesh division and the model with refined mesh division are reported, as an example, for the Eastern walls of the building. The comparison showed that the refined model is able to provide a very precise cracking distribution and a higher damage level, mainly due to the advantage of having a division higher than one in the direction of the wall's thickness, but with a sensibly higher computational cost [19]. For the first three modes, Figure 9 shows the variation of the periods' values for the two mesh divisions due to the damage progression during the non-linear analysis.…”
Section: Non-linear Dynamic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the meshing was selected to avoid creating elements with large aspect ratios and was opportunely validated [19]. The model of the building is reported in Figure 5a, where the timber beams of the floors can be seen.…”
Section: Applied Element Strategy and Materials Model For Masonrymentioning
confidence: 99%