2017
DOI: 10.1111/anec.12440
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the ECG based Selvester scoring method to estimate myocardial scar burden and predict clinical outcome in patients with left bundle branch block, with comparison to late gadolinium enhancement CMR imaging

Abstract: There is a modest correlation between LGE-CMR and Selvester scoring verified myocardial scar. CMR based scar burden is correlated to clinical outcome, but Selvester scoring is not. The Selvester scoring algorithm needs to be further refined in order to be clinically relevant and reliable for detailed scar evaluation in patients with LBBB.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing our results with that of the other methods listed in Table 2, it must be taken into account that the underlying cohorts differ in size, structure and time of study. Considering the larger training sets used by Goovaerts et al (2019) and by Dima et al (2013) and the limited number of cases used by Chaudhry et al (2017) and Bignoto et al (2018), our results are similar. For a more substantiated comparison, the methods would have to be applied to the identical data, see Bengio and Grandvalet (2004).…”
Section: Model Performancesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Comparing our results with that of the other methods listed in Table 2, it must be taken into account that the underlying cohorts differ in size, structure and time of study. Considering the larger training sets used by Goovaerts et al (2019) and by Dima et al (2013) and the limited number of cases used by Chaudhry et al (2017) and Bignoto et al (2018), our results are similar. For a more substantiated comparison, the methods would have to be applied to the identical data, see Bengio and Grandvalet (2004).…”
Section: Model Performancesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Therefore, the question about the predisposing factors of this conduction abnormality (function abnormality) is still on the table. A published article conducted in 2017, focused on cardiac MRI and scar burden in LBBB patients to predict their future outcome (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMR was performed as previously described by Chaudhry et al [23]. In short, LVEF was determined by cine imaging in breath hold with semiautomatic tracing of the endocardium in both short-axis and long-axis projections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%