2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of FluBlok® trivalent recombinant baculovirus-expressed hemagglutinin influenza vaccine administered intramuscularly to healthy adults 50–64 years of age☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although RIV3 was licensed initially for use in persons aged 18 through 49 years, in October 2014, the approved age indication was expanded to ≥18 years on the basis of data from randomized trials demonstrating adequate immunogenicity among persons aged ≥50 years (275,276); effectiveness data are not yet available for this age group.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Laiv3/4 and Iiv Efficacy Or Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although RIV3 was licensed initially for use in persons aged 18 through 49 years, in October 2014, the approved age indication was expanded to ≥18 years on the basis of data from randomized trials demonstrating adequate immunogenicity among persons aged ≥50 years (275,276); effectiveness data are not yet available for this age group.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Laiv3/4 and Iiv Efficacy Or Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vaccine contains three times (45 mg) the usual quantity of HA for each of the three subtypes and has been highly immunogenic in young and older adults but not in children. [26][27][28][29] A field efficacy trial in healthy young adults during the 2007-08 influenza season demonstrated an efficacy of 44.6% against laboratory-confirmed CDC-defined influenza-like illness, which, in the context of a significant mismatch between strains contained in the vaccine and circulating viruses that season, was within expectations and consistent with the reported efficacy of mismatched conventional trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV). 30 Although the efficacy trial is the first to demonstrate that an HA-only vaccine is sufficient to protect against infection and disease, formulations containing recombinant NA are in development.…”
Section: Recombinant Subunit-based Influenza Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Animals given HR-Tet did not develop any adverse effects due to vaccination, and there was no evidence of reactogenicity at the site of vaccination. Preliminary studies with wild-types strains of DENV indicate that the HR-Tet strains of DENV can be grown to adequate titers in Sf9 cells, which are a clonal cell line of Spodoptera frugiperdia (Fall armyworm) and have been used in the production of the FDA-approved live viral vaccine FluBlok (60)(61)(62). Collectively, these data suggest that HRTet warrants development as a LAV vaccine for use in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%