2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1, merozoite surface protein 1 or RTS,S vaccines with adjuvant system AS02A administered alone or concurrently in rhesus monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was confirmed by sporozoite challenge in which no significant differences were observed in survival between mice immunized against PyMSP1 42 alone, compared with mice immunized against both PyMSP1 42 and PyCSP. These results are in agreement with a study combining the RTS,S (CSP vaccine) with MSP1 42 and AMA1 protein vaccines in rhesus macaques (15), in which there was no interference between Ab responses against RTS,S and MSP1 42 . However the authors reported that MSP1 42 immunization interfered with both AMA1-specific Abs and IFN-g production, and it will be important in future studies to ascertain whether antigenic interference is an Ag-specific phenomenon or related to specific vaccine delivery platforms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding was confirmed by sporozoite challenge in which no significant differences were observed in survival between mice immunized against PyMSP1 42 alone, compared with mice immunized against both PyMSP1 42 and PyCSP. These results are in agreement with a study combining the RTS,S (CSP vaccine) with MSP1 42 and AMA1 protein vaccines in rhesus macaques (15), in which there was no interference between Ab responses against RTS,S and MSP1 42 . However the authors reported that MSP1 42 immunization interfered with both AMA1-specific Abs and IFN-g production, and it will be important in future studies to ascertain whether antigenic interference is an Ag-specific phenomenon or related to specific vaccine delivery platforms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is suggested that a secondgeneration vaccine will need to provide .80% efficacy for at least 4 y to justify deployment (14). One possible strategy that has been investigated preclinically in rhesus macaques is the combination of RTS,S/AS02 A with protein-in-adjuvant vaccine candidates for the blood-stage Ags MSP1 and AMA1 (15). This study found that AMA1-specific Ab responses are reduced when AMA1 is coadministered with either RTS,S or the 42-kDa C terminus of MSP1 (MSP1 42 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A major concern for the development of multivalent vaccines is the potential for vaccine interference that would be associated with poor immune response (29). This effect has been reported using combinations of recombinant proteins (PyMSP-1 42 and PyMSP-8 [25] or PfMSP-1 42 and PfAMA-1 [17]) or using viral vectors combining PyCSP and PyMSP-1 42 (13). In these models, reduced antibody or CD8 ϩ T cell responses suggest a potential adverse interaction that would preclude the use of MSP-1 as a component of a multiantigen vaccine (25).…”
Section: Fig 6 Effects Of Cd4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vaccine that can reduce the human toll would be a valuable resource in the fight against malaria. A number of subunit vaccine candidates have been proposed and tested, some with encouraging results (Ellis et al 2009;Pichyangkul et al 2009). For the asexual blood stage, one of the highly regarded candidate antigens is the 19-kDa C-terminal fragment of merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1 19 ) (Daly and Long 1993;Hirunpetcharat et al 1997;Mazumdar et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%