2010
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2010.038141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the removal of point-of-sale tobacco displays in Ireland

Abstract: Aim:To evaluate the short-term impacts of removing point of sale promotional displays in Ireland, implemented in July 2009.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
119
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(18 reference statements)
7
119
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, removal of PoS displays as a tobacco control policy might play an important role in reducing smoking uptake and prevalence among young people in the long term by reducing the numbers who become susceptible to smoking. Removal of PoS displays of tobacco products is widely supported by the general public 31, 32, primarily as a means to protect children from exposure to promotion of a lethal product 33. As PoS exposure also undermines the success of smoking cessation attempts 34, there is strong justification for the removal of these displays to support smokers who are trying to quit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, removal of PoS displays as a tobacco control policy might play an important role in reducing smoking uptake and prevalence among young people in the long term by reducing the numbers who become susceptible to smoking. Removal of PoS displays of tobacco products is widely supported by the general public 31, 32, primarily as a means to protect children from exposure to promotion of a lethal product 33. As PoS exposure also undermines the success of smoking cessation attempts 34, there is strong justification for the removal of these displays to support smokers who are trying to quit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As PoS exposure also undermines the success of smoking cessation attempts 34, there is strong justification for the removal of these displays to support smokers who are trying to quit. Removal of PoS displays in Ireland led to a decrease in the proportion of adult smokers and children noticing displays, and children also thought that removal of PoS displays made it easier for children not to smoke and helped to de‐normalize smoking 32. Also, while retailers are understandably concerned that implementation of PoS display bans will reduce their income from sales of tobacco products, the effect of removal of displays on smoking prevalence, at least in the short term, is likely to be modest and have a negligible effect on sales to regular smokers 35.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,[28][29][30] Evaluations of these restrictions provide evidence for the potential benefits of keeping PoS displays out of sight. For example, following a ban on PoS display in Ireland in 2009, the number of youths overestimating how many of their peers smoke regularly declined by nearly 30 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Following previous studies, a dichotomous variable representing overestimation of smoking among peers was created using a median split (1 = overestimated; 0 = not overestimated). 22,23 Setting the threshold at 20 % is conservative and allows for variation between schools and within schools between grades. Subjective norms were assessed by asking students to rate whether their friends approve of smoking on a five-point scale ranging from strongly approve to strongly disapprove.…”
Section: Social Influences On Smoking Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudios en otros países han demostrado que la prohibición de publicidad en los PV cuenta con el apoyo de los fumadores 20,33 y además no se asocia con una pérdida en las ventas. 34 En Argentina, un estudio basado en datos de la Encuesta Mundial de Tabaquismo en Adultos de 2012 muestra que, con excepción de la población más joven y de aquélla de bajo y mediano nivel socioeconómico, existe un amplio apoyo de la población adulta frente a las restricciones totales de la publicidad. 35 Este antecedente es importante, ya que permitirá avanzar en la implementación de restricciones más severas de la publicidad en los PV.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified