2020
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.264952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Reinforcing Strength of Phendimetrazine Using a Progressive-Ratio Schedule of Reinforcement in Rhesus Monkeys

Abstract: Stimulant abuse is a persistent public health problem with no FDA-approved pharmacotherapy.Although monoamine-releasing drugs such as d-amphetamine can decrease cocaine selfadministration in human and animal laboratory studies, their potential for abuse limits clinical utility. "Abuse-deterrent" formulations of monoamine releasers such as pro-drugs hold greater clinical promise if their abuse potential is, as theorized, lower than that of cocaine. In these studies, we determined the reinforcing strength of phe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the PR schedule of reinforcement, it appears that a ceiling effect may have been evident in some monkeys, such that the break point only occurred because the 4 hour session timed out. However, based on recent findings in which PR parameters were manipulated using a within-subjects design [ 61 ], it is likely that a longer session length, without changing other parameters, would have increased the break point for both cocaine and cocaine + nicotine and not changed the overall conclusion for this experiment. As it relates to the cocaine vs. food choice studies, we could expand this paradigm to include studies involving reinstatement/relapse, as described by others [ 73 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the PR schedule of reinforcement, it appears that a ceiling effect may have been evident in some monkeys, such that the break point only occurred because the 4 hour session timed out. However, based on recent findings in which PR parameters were manipulated using a within-subjects design [ 61 ], it is likely that a longer session length, without changing other parameters, would have increased the break point for both cocaine and cocaine + nicotine and not changed the overall conclusion for this experiment. As it relates to the cocaine vs. food choice studies, we could expand this paradigm to include studies involving reinstatement/relapse, as described by others [ 73 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drug self-administration sessions began at approximately 8:00 AM each day and were conducted 5–7 days per week. Detailed methods have been described previously [ 61 ]. Briefly, daily behavioral sessions were comprised of a multiple schedule, in which the first component was a fixed-ratio (FR) 20 schedule of food availability, in which 20 responses on the right switch were required to deliver a food pellet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%