2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the radiological criteria to diagnose large vestibular aqueduct syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation was that the imaging criteria employed to diagnose EVA in this study were the classic Valvassori criterion. Compared to the recent Cincinnati criteria, the lower sensitivity of Valvassori criterion may also contribute to the small sample size involved ( 38 ). Therefore, the small sample size may limit the generalizability of our findings and future prospective study involving a larger cohort of EVA patients are warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation was that the imaging criteria employed to diagnose EVA in this study were the classic Valvassori criterion. Compared to the recent Cincinnati criteria, the lower sensitivity of Valvassori criterion may also contribute to the small sample size involved ( 38 ). Therefore, the small sample size may limit the generalizability of our findings and future prospective study involving a larger cohort of EVA patients are warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many other hypotheses have been proposed, including events that cause the variation of cerebrospinal fluid pressure [30]. HRCT is the choice of imaging modality to diagnose EVA [31]. However, MR imaging can give additional information about inner ear fluid status, which CT cannot provide.…”
Section: Enlarged Vestibular Aqueductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11, 12) [32]. However, Cincinnati criteria (VA larger than 0.9 mm at the midpoint or larger than 1.9 mm at the operculum), proposed by Boston et al in 2007, have been showed to be more sensitive to diagnose EVA [31][32][33].…”
Section: Enlarged Vestibular Aqueductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endolymphatic duct extends from the posterior aspect of the vestibule toward the posterior cranial fossa, and ends in a blind pouch, the endolymphatic sac, at the posterior margin of the petrous ridge. The bony vestibular aqueduct surrounds the endolymphatic duct and normally measures up to 1 mm at the midpoint and 2 mm at the operculum, according to the Cincinnati criteria [1].…”
Section: Inner Earmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15.4). There The most sensitive criteria is the Cincinnati criteria which defines abnormal as >0.9 mm at the midpoint or >1.9 mm at the operculum in the axial view [1]. Other criteria are using the semicircular canal as reference-enlarged if width at the proximal intraosseous portion exceeded that of the adjacent posterior semicircular canal.…”
Section: Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%