Abstract:Current studies focus on cellular and humoral immunity induced by novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Non-responders to vaccinations are not uncommonly encountered in clinical medicine (e.g. in the field of hepatitis B). Whereas vaccine-induced humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is compromised by emerging Variants of Concern (VOCs), cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is emerging as resilient against VOCs. Thus commercially available test kits for diagnostic laboratories designed to evaluate cellular immune responses… Show more
“…This notion is supported by previous data from pre-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine era that showed a considerable degree of correlation between anti-N and anti-S IgG antibodies generated post-infection. 24 Our finding of poor correlations between antibodies and T-cell responses is consistent with some other studies showing no or low correlations between humoral and cellular immune parameters in vaccinated 25–30 and convalescent 31–33 individuals.…”
It is uncertain to which extent antibody and T-cell responses after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 are associated with reduced risk of breakthrough infection and whether their measurement enhances risk prediction. We conducted a phase-4 open-label clinical trial in the pre-omicron era, enrolling 2,760 individuals aged ≥16 years 35±8 days after having received the second dose of BNT162b2 (baseline 15-21 May 2021). Over a median 5.9-month of follow-up, we identified incident SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections using weekly antigen tests, a confirmatory PCR test, and/or serological evidence for incident infection. We quantified relative risks adjusted for age, sex, and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection for different immunological parameters and assessed improvements in risk discrimination. In contrast to the T-cell response, higher plasma levels of binding antibodies and antibodies in a surrogate neutralization assay were associated with reduced risk of breakthrough infection. Furthermore, assessment of anti-spike IgG levels enhanced prediction of breakthrough infection and may therefore be a suitable measurable correlate of protection in practice.
“…This notion is supported by previous data from pre-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine era that showed a considerable degree of correlation between anti-N and anti-S IgG antibodies generated post-infection. 24 Our finding of poor correlations between antibodies and T-cell responses is consistent with some other studies showing no or low correlations between humoral and cellular immune parameters in vaccinated 25–30 and convalescent 31–33 individuals.…”
It is uncertain to which extent antibody and T-cell responses after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 are associated with reduced risk of breakthrough infection and whether their measurement enhances risk prediction. We conducted a phase-4 open-label clinical trial in the pre-omicron era, enrolling 2,760 individuals aged ≥16 years 35±8 days after having received the second dose of BNT162b2 (baseline 15-21 May 2021). Over a median 5.9-month of follow-up, we identified incident SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections using weekly antigen tests, a confirmatory PCR test, and/or serological evidence for incident infection. We quantified relative risks adjusted for age, sex, and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection for different immunological parameters and assessed improvements in risk discrimination. In contrast to the T-cell response, higher plasma levels of binding antibodies and antibodies in a surrogate neutralization assay were associated with reduced risk of breakthrough infection. Furthermore, assessment of anti-spike IgG levels enhanced prediction of breakthrough infection and may therefore be a suitable measurable correlate of protection in practice.
“…The T cell activity was estimated in prebooster and postbooster whole blood samples using the Quantiferon SARS-CoV-2 assay (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany [ 53 – 55 ]). In brief, we quantified the IFN-γ-release after a 21 h incubation of 1 mL heparinized whole blood portions with two different SARS-CoV-2 antigen mixtures (Ag1, Ag2), and with a negative (“Ce point, IFN-γ) values of the negative (Nil) control were subtracted from the SARS-CoV-2 specific antigen mixes results of the samples and presented as Ag1-Nil and Ag2-Nil, respectively.…”
This work showed that the comparability of apparently standardized SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays (Roche, Abbott; both given in BAU/mL) after vaccination depends on the time of blood withdrawal. Initially (3 weeks after the first dose AZD1222), there were 3 times higher values in the Abbott assay, but this relationship inversed before boosting (11 weeks after the first dose) with Roche 2 times greater than Abbott.
“…Therefore, the provider has established the cut-off in the QuantiFERON assay at 0.350 IU IFN-γ/mL for mycobacterium tuberculosis, at 0.200 IU IFN-γ/mL for cytomegalovirus, and proposed 0.150 IU IFN-γ/mL for SARS-Cov2. When using the QuantiFERON SARS-Cov2 assay in vaccinated healthy individuals following the second injection, the prevalence ranged from 44% when using mRNA-1273 to 80% with BNT162b2 [ 8 , 14 ], which supports the need to optimize the IGRA assay. This can be done, as performed in our study, by taking into consideration several parameters: (i) the use of recombinant proteins instead of overlapping peptides, making it possible to avoid presentation to T cells by antigen presenting cells (APC) of overlapping and degradation peptides; (ii) a large population of non-vaccinated individuals; and (iii) the detection of a specific T cell response distinct from Spike, such as directed against the nucleocapsid, to distinguish vaccination from recent infections and or pre-existing immunity to seasonal human beta-coronaviridae [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this gap can be overcome by using whole blood assays based on the evidence that the blood based interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) is an attractive alternative to ELISpot, as demonstrated for tuberculosis [ 1 ]. Unfortunately, primary whole blood IGRA-based assays using exhaustive libraries of synthetic peptides for Spike and developed for routine use showed limited sensitivity in a COVID19 vaccinated volunteer population [ 8 , 14 ], which limits their clinical application.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.