1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.1996.tb01524.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the quality of spray distribution from boom sprayers in practical conditions1

Abstract: The quality of distribution from field sprayers involves many parameters. Distribution is affected by environmental conditions. It also depends on static parameters concerning the boom at rest, and dynamic parameters involving boom movements. Field measurements at the Biologische Bundesanstalt (BBA) have shown the importance of the dynamic criteria. To avoid the effect of environmental parameters. one solution is to use a track simulator. A method has been developed at Cemagref (FR) to simulate distribution on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distribution quality of the spraying nozzles are based on several parameters such as the static and dynamic parameters of sprayer boom. In addition to this, the distribution is also affected by environmental conditions (Sinfort and Herbst, 1996). Accumulation and distribution of fungicide applied on the target surface is not only affected by flow rate of a single nozzle, but also by several factors such as nozzle spray pattern, spray direction, auxiliary airflow, drop dynamics (Foqué et al, 2012;Xie et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distribution quality of the spraying nozzles are based on several parameters such as the static and dynamic parameters of sprayer boom. In addition to this, the distribution is also affected by environmental conditions (Sinfort and Herbst, 1996). Accumulation and distribution of fungicide applied on the target surface is not only affected by flow rate of a single nozzle, but also by several factors such as nozzle spray pattern, spray direction, auxiliary airflow, drop dynamics (Foqué et al, 2012;Xie et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field measurements at the Federal Biological Research Centre Braunschweig (BBA) have shown the importance of the dynamic criteria. To avoid the effect of vehicle parameters, one solution is to use the motion simulator [12,13] . So a six DOF motion simulator was built and used for the dynamic characteristics optimization of boom suspension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of variation founded stays from 5% to 17% for boom static conditions and 6% to 37% for boom in motion (6 to 26 km.h -1 ). Sinfort and Herbst (1996) studied the boom movement and the spray pattern in terms of practical use. The movements of the spray boom were evaluated by a simulator with hydraulic cylinders and the spray pattern was simulated by software.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%