2020
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the PTW microDiamond in edge‐on orientation for dosimetry in small fields

Abstract: Purpose: The PTW microDiamond has an enhanced spatial resolution when operated in an edge-on orientation but is not typically utilized in this orientation due to the specifications of the IAEA TRS-483 code of practice for small field dosimetry. In this work the suitability of an edge-on orientation and advantages over the recommended face-on orientation will be presented. Methods: The PTW microDiamond in both orientations was compared on a Varian TrueBeam linac for: machine output factor (OF), percentage depth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(38 reference statements)
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-coplanar angular dependence of the diamond detector was found to be within 5% for a range of clinically deliverable gantry and couch angles. These results agree with studies performed by Brace et al [18] and Veselsky et al [25] who found similar angular dependencies for gantry angles up to 70 • , but very large angular dependencies of up to 30% when irradiating through the stem of the detector. These beam angles would not be clinically deliverable in SRS treatment plans delivered on a conventional linac, and have therefore not been considered by in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The non-coplanar angular dependence of the diamond detector was found to be within 5% for a range of clinically deliverable gantry and couch angles. These results agree with studies performed by Brace et al [18] and Veselsky et al [25] who found similar angular dependencies for gantry angles up to 70 • , but very large angular dependencies of up to 30% when irradiating through the stem of the detector. These beam angles would not be clinically deliverable in SRS treatment plans delivered on a conventional linac, and have therefore not been considered by in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For SRS and SBRT this concept is extended, as the treatment delivery may involve non-coplanar couch and gantry angles. Angular dependence of the diamond detectors in a perpendicular orientation has been investigated, however angular correction factors have not been presented [18]. In addition, direct dose measurements are not typically reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDDs were acquired using a PTW (Freiburg, Germany) Semiflex 3D ionization chamber for fields ≥ 4 cm 2 and a PTW microdiamond 19 in the edge‐on orientation 20 for fields <4 cm 2 in a PTW Beamscan water tank under the following field sizes: 1 × 1, 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 10 × 10, and 28 × 28 cm 2 . Profiles were acquired using the same detector and water tank, but only under field sizes of 4 × 4, 10 × 10 and 28 × 28 cm 2 and depths of 1.3 cm (D max ), 10.0 and 20.0 cm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDDs were acquired using a PTW (Freiburg, Germany) Semiflex 3D ionization chamber for fields ≥ 4 cm 2 and a PTW microdiamond 19 in the edge-on orientation 20 and a microdiamond in the edge-on orientation for fields < 4 cm 2 , with the detector sitting at 10 cm depth and 90 cm SSD in a water tank. Readings were referenced back to that of 10 × 10 cm 2 through daisy-chaining 21 to calculate output factors.…”
Section: A1 | Pdds and Profiles Of Standard Square Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detector housing also affects its directional dependence; it therefore seems to be very important to verify the response of the detector in the given set-up. This is true for silicon diodes [97], and for diamond detectors [98,99]. A suitable diamond dosimeter must be incorporated into a suitable probe's housing which should not introduce energy dependence.…”
Section: Detector Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%