2000
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.31.6.598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project: A retrospective analysis.

Abstract: The authors conclude that the PDP successfully achieved a primary objective for which it was established by demonstrating that licensed psychologists can be trained to provide safe, high-quality pharmacological care. As such, the project serves as a foundation for efforts to include prescription authority in state licensing laws and for the further development of a psychological model for prescribing. The Department of Defense (DoD) Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project (PDP) has been one of the most intens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of the most often cited of these concerns are the perceived ineffectiveness of training programs for prescribing psychologists and a fear that prescriptive authority would subvert and dominate practitioners' professional identities (Lichtenberg et al, 2008). While these concerns raise legitimate issues, empirical evidence exists that questions their validity (LeVine & Foster, 2010;LeVine & Wiggins, 2010;Muse & McGrath, 2010b;Newman, Phelps, Sammons, Dunivin, & Cullen, 2000). The author hopes that in detailing and empirically addressing these concerns, practitioners' potential hesitations over supporting prescriptive authority can be assuaged and their support for the RxP movement can be garnered.…”
Section: Concerns Regarding Prescriptive Authoritymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two of the most often cited of these concerns are the perceived ineffectiveness of training programs for prescribing psychologists and a fear that prescriptive authority would subvert and dominate practitioners' professional identities (Lichtenberg et al, 2008). While these concerns raise legitimate issues, empirical evidence exists that questions their validity (LeVine & Foster, 2010;LeVine & Wiggins, 2010;Muse & McGrath, 2010b;Newman, Phelps, Sammons, Dunivin, & Cullen, 2000). The author hopes that in detailing and empirically addressing these concerns, practitioners' potential hesitations over supporting prescriptive authority can be assuaged and their support for the RxP movement can be garnered.…”
Section: Concerns Regarding Prescriptive Authoritymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Counseling psychology practitioners can support the RxP movement because empirical evidence exists to support the comprehensiveness, safety, and efficacy of Level 3 training curricula for all licensed psychologists (LeVine & Wiggins, 2010;Muse & McGrath, 2010b;Newman et al, 2000). Some psychologists have stated that training programs for prescribing psychologists are on average less than half as long as those for other prescribing medical professionals (Heiby, 2002;Heiby et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Safety and Effectiveness Of Training Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elaine Orabona Mantell is one of ten Department of Defense Prescribing Psychologists (Newman, 2000;Newman, Phelps, Sammons, Dunivin, & Cullen, 2000;Sammons, Paige, & Levant, 2003). Her story:…”
Section: The Future Of Prescribing Psychologistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader is not informed that the report contained numerous positive findings about the PDP and that, among other things, the PDP psychologists “filled critical needs, and performed with excellence wherever they served” (ACNP, 1998, p. 2). Further, Robiner et al fail to cite the three additional evaluations of the PDP (see Newman et al, 2000, for an analysis of all four evaluations), whose results are relevant to the debate. Robiner et al would have us believe that psycho‐pharmacology training is a research‐based, uniform curriculum in residency programs. Nothing could be further from the reality.…”
Section: Selective Information Is Misinformationmentioning
confidence: 99%