2022
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10060985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Revised Piper Fatigue Scale in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract: Background: Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and has a major impact on their quality of life. Measurement tools that assess the patient’s condition are commonly used in the neurological field, though diagnostic tools are currently unable to distinguish potential alternative causes of fatigue in individual patients. The Revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS-R) is a self-administered assessment scale that is internationally used for fatigue measurement. Aim: This st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CRF status of the patients was evaluated with the Chinese edition of the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS)[ 12 ]. The PFS is a subjective self-evaluation scale of perceived fatigue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CRF status of the patients was evaluated with the Chinese edition of the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS)[ 12 ]. The PFS is a subjective self-evaluation scale of perceived fatigue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each dimension had 9 items, each scoring according to 1 to 7 levels. The higher the score, the smaller the impact of CINV on functional living; (4) CRF: The Chinese version of the Revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS-R)[ 10 ] was employed to examine the level of fatigue in the two groups before and following the intervention. It consists of 22 questions and is categorized as follows: Behavior, emotion, perception, and cognition; (5) Mental state: The medical coping style scale[ 11 ] was applied to determine the coping style of both groups before and after the intervention, which was divided into three dimensions: Avoidance, yield and facing, with 20 items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An expert committee composed of health professionals (1 neurologist, 1 ophthalmologist, 2 speech therapists, 2 physical therapists, 1 neuropsychologist) and experts of psychometry [17][18][19][20] developed the FLASH on the theoretical concept that a functional assessment of hemianopia could offer a qualitative and structured analysis of the most common behaviors observed in patients with hemianopia The expert committee's role was to consolidate all the versions of the questionnaire and develop the prefinal version of the questionnaire for field-testing. The committee reached a consensus on any discrepancy.…”
Section: Questionnaire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%