2021
DOI: 10.1080/17486025.2021.1889686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the pseudo-dynamic bearing capacity of surface footings on cohesionless soils using finite element lower bound limit analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, initially suggested by Lysmer (1970) and Anderheggen and Knöpfel (1972) and then upgraded by Sloan (1988), the limit analysis using finite element discretization methods and linear programming has been adopted in several studies to capture the limit state loadings of complex geo-structures. In more recent studies, the nonlinear programming of the finite element limit analysis (secondorder cone programming, SOCP) has also been developed and exploited in several stability analyses (Lyamin and Sloan 2002;Makrodimopoulos and Martin 2006;Krabbenhøft et al 2008;Fathipour et al 2020Fathipour et al , 2021aSafardoost Siahmazgi et al 2021). To shed further light on the matter, with this method, the original nonlinear form of the Mohr-Coulomb yield function in terms of the normal and shear stresses has been modelled and utilized in the FELA formulations so as to show more realistic soil responses (Krabbenhøft et al 2008;Fathipour et al 2020Fathipour et al , 2021a.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, initially suggested by Lysmer (1970) and Anderheggen and Knöpfel (1972) and then upgraded by Sloan (1988), the limit analysis using finite element discretization methods and linear programming has been adopted in several studies to capture the limit state loadings of complex geo-structures. In more recent studies, the nonlinear programming of the finite element limit analysis (secondorder cone programming, SOCP) has also been developed and exploited in several stability analyses (Lyamin and Sloan 2002;Makrodimopoulos and Martin 2006;Krabbenhøft et al 2008;Fathipour et al 2020Fathipour et al , 2021aSafardoost Siahmazgi et al 2021). To shed further light on the matter, with this method, the original nonlinear form of the Mohr-Coulomb yield function in terms of the normal and shear stresses has been modelled and utilized in the FELA formulations so as to show more realistic soil responses (Krabbenhøft et al 2008;Fathipour et al 2020Fathipour et al , 2021a.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active state of the nodal stresses throughout the domain is obtained by maximizing the unknown variables as Maximize({ ;z}) subjected to the above-mentioned constraints. Further details of the adopted approach could be found in some previous studies, including Makrodimopoulos and Martin (2006), Krabbenhøft et al (2008), Ukritchon andKeawsawasvong (2018, 2019a, b, c), Fathipour et al (2020Fathipour et al ( , 2021a Safardoost Siahmazgi et al (2021) and Mirmoazen et al (2021). For better illustration of the superiority of the FELA formulations over the finite element (FE), limit equilibrium (LE) and other stability analysis techniques, the readers are referred to the several previous studies in this area (Fathipour et al 2021b, among others).…”
Section: Socp Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower bound theorem of FELA has been employed in this study to evaluate the seismic bearing capacity of such a surface footing. The corresponding approach seeks the lower bound of the actual collapse load of the foundation by accounting for an admissible stress field within the soil medium underneath using either linear programming (LP) or second-order cone programming (SOCP) techniques [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Finite Element Limit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%