2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-4451-54-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. Using Multiple Evaluation Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To triangulate the findings, two evaluation approaches were used to examine the effectiveness of nFTF service learning amid the pandemic: objective outcome evaluation (OOE) and subjective outcome evaluation (SOE). OOE concerns the change in student attributes before and after participating in service learning [ 43 , 44 ]. This study used a one-group pretest-posttest design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To triangulate the findings, two evaluation approaches were used to examine the effectiveness of nFTF service learning amid the pandemic: objective outcome evaluation (OOE) and subjective outcome evaluation (SOE). OOE concerns the change in student attributes before and after participating in service learning [ 43 , 44 ]. This study used a one-group pretest-posttest design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies evaluating students' STEAM literacy or competence have not established a comprehensive framework or measurement model (Conner et al, 2017; Herro et al, 2017). These studies may also be limited due to small sample sizes, a lack of scientific basis, and questions about reliability and validity (Shek, 2013; Shek & Lin, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%