Evaluation of the progression of visual field damage in patients suffering from early manifest glaucoma

Abstract

BackgroundThis retrospective study aimed to determine how often a perimetric examination should be carried out in order to identify visual field (VF) changes in patients with relatively early manifestation glaucoma.Materials and methodsPatients included had a relatively recent manifestation of primary open-angle glaucoma. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years and a minimum of seven VF tests were included. Statistical analysis was performed to verify the trend of variations in mean defect (MD) over time (PeriData). The results were subjected to a t-test for a comparative analysis of progression of VF changes over time. The annual rate of progression provided by PeriData considering all the VFs analyzed was compared with that obtained on half of the VF examinations during the same follow-up period. An analysis of the MD trend over time was also carried out in relationship to the number of VF tests done and by dividing the sample into a high-frequency group (more than eight VFs) and a low-frequency group (fewer than eight VFs) in the follow-up period.ResultsA total of 96 eyes of 96 patients were included, and overall 846 VFs were examined. The paired t-test performed comparing the MD index of all the VFs against half of them did not show statistical significance (P=0.537). The high-frequency group comprised 39 eyes (average VF 11.05±1.91, average time interval 0.76 years) while the low-frequency group comprised 57 eyes (average VF 6.95±0.6, average time interval 1.21 years). The analysis of the MD trend in the high-frequency patients showed significance (P=0.017); the low-frequency group did not show statistical significance (P=0.08).ConclusionThe number of VFs in a determined time interval was not significant. However, a greater frequency of tests provides a predictive evaluation of the rate of progression of early manifestation open-angle glaucoma.

<p>Ganglion Cell Complex Analysis in Glaucoma Patients: What Can It Tell Us?</p>

“…1,2 Standard automated perimetry (SAP) has been widely used to assess visual function in glaucomatous eyes for staging and monitoring the disease progression. [3][4][5][6][7] However, it has been estimated that at least 25% to 35% of RGCs must be lost before producing significant abnormalities on the visual field. 8 Several clinical studies confirmed that the decline in RGCs precedes functional changes detected on SAP in glaucomatous eyes, confirming that a combination of structural and functional tests might offer an optimal assessment of the neural damage and its progression.…”

An Iconic Case of Pigmentary Glaucoma: Brief Review of the Literature

“…Diagnosis of PDS and PG is performed with a thorough clinical inspection involving slit lamp examination of the anterior chamber (focusing on chamber depth, corneal pigment deposits, and iris defects), IOP measurement, ocular fundus assessment, and gonioscopy; the latter examination typically reveals an open chamber angle with a hyperpigmentation of the trabecular meshwork [ 7 ]. In order to complete diagnosis and to establish the clinical stage of the disease other instrumental tests are usually performed, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), useful to evaluate the optic nerve and the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ultrasound biomicroscopy, essential to study the relationship between the structures in the anterior chamber, and visual field analysis [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Medical therapy and surgical and parasurgical treatments are identical to those performed for primary open-angle glaucoma [ 11 ].…”

Glaucoma Progression. Impact of Risk Factors on the Disease

“…Для медленно прогрессирующих пациентов такого соответствия не получено. ОКТ показала чувствительность к выявлению изменений в 100 % случаев, в то время как статическая автоматизированная периметрия -только в 76 % [4,20,22].…”