2024
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-024-06927-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) as a tool for assessing disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Nuran Öz,
Halise Hande Gezer,
Selin Cilli Hayıroğlu
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on available resources and rules of thumb, a total of 200 patients (50 in each city, male to female = 1:2) were planned to recruit. The inclusion criteria were: (1) Informed and voluntary; (2) 18–70 years (Considering the challenges and precision involved in questionnaire completion by older adults, previous research protocols 26 , and available resources); (3) Diagnosed with RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification diagnostic criteria (score ≥ 6) 27 . The exclusion criteria were: (1) Pregnant women, individuals with psychiatric disease, and patients who were unconscious and unable to feedback their condition; (2) Patients suffering from other serious diseases such as tumors, myocardial infarct.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on available resources and rules of thumb, a total of 200 patients (50 in each city, male to female = 1:2) were planned to recruit. The inclusion criteria were: (1) Informed and voluntary; (2) 18–70 years (Considering the challenges and precision involved in questionnaire completion by older adults, previous research protocols 26 , and available resources); (3) Diagnosed with RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification diagnostic criteria (score ≥ 6) 27 . The exclusion criteria were: (1) Pregnant women, individuals with psychiatric disease, and patients who were unconscious and unable to feedback their condition; (2) Patients suffering from other serious diseases such as tumors, myocardial infarct.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%