2014
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-014-0560-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the presence and zoonotic transmission of Chlamydia suis in a pig slaughterhouse

Abstract: BackgroundA significant number of studies on pig farms and wild boars worldwide, demonstrate the endemic presence of Chlamydia suis in pigs. However, the zoonotic potential of this pathogen, phylogenetically closely related to Chlamydia trachomatis, is still uninvestigated. Therefore, this study aims to examine the zoonotic transmission in a Belgian pig abattoir.MethodsPresence of Chlamydia suis in pigs, contact surfaces, air and employees was assessed using a Chlamydia suis specific real-time PCR and culture.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the in vitro susceptibility test of Chlamydia to antimicrobials is not affordable for all laboratories as it is a time-consuming assay. Consequently, tet (C) PCR is more commonly used for detection than the antibiotic susceptibility assay [15, 29]. In the current study, we found clear evidence for the benefit of isolating samples prior to molecular analysis over tet (C) PCR directly from clinical swabs as well as the superiority of the tetracycline susceptibility assay with and without PCR analysis over tet (C) detection alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Furthermore, the in vitro susceptibility test of Chlamydia to antimicrobials is not affordable for all laboratories as it is a time-consuming assay. Consequently, tet (C) PCR is more commonly used for detection than the antibiotic susceptibility assay [15, 29]. In the current study, we found clear evidence for the benefit of isolating samples prior to molecular analysis over tet (C) PCR directly from clinical swabs as well as the superiority of the tetracycline susceptibility assay with and without PCR analysis over tet (C) detection alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, detection of chlamydial organisms in Australian pigs raises new questions. Whilst globally C. suis is recognized as the most relevant chlamydial pig pathogen with demonstrated zoonotic potential (De Puysseleyr et al, ), with C. abortus, C. psittaci, and/or C. pecorum also regularly detected (Hoffmann et al, ), almost nothing is known about chlamydial infections in Australian pigs. The detection of C. pecorum in ocular and rectal samples from two pigs was not surprising to us, as the three pigs were from the same C. pecorum ‐endemic region as the sheep and cattle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these factors might have severe consequences for human health, considering that both C. suis and C. trachomatis DNA have been detected simultaneously in the eyes of trachoma patients in Nepal. Moreover, C. suis was isolated from ocular and rectal samples originating from slaughterhouse workers and pig farmers [20][21][22][23]. The use of sub-inhibitory concentrations of tetracycline, especially in the presence of tetracycline-resistant C. suis isolates, could lead to treatment failure and the selection of tetracycline resistance on herd-level with the potential recurrence of clinical signs [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%