Evaluation of the predictive impact of cephalometric variables

Abstract

In the context of orthodontic treatment planning, the decisions to be made are often affected by the assumption of future growth patterns, especially the direction of mandibular rotation. Using longitudinally available lateral cephalograms from the Belfast Growth Study, it was examined whether, on the basis of the cephalometric variables at the ages of 7, 9 and 11, the direction of mandibular rotation can be predicted in the respective subsequent 4-year intervals. For statistical analysis of this problem, logistic regression models were applied to describe and quantify the influence of potential explanatory variables on the direction of mandibular rotation (dependent variable). In addition, graphical methods taken from the field of medical diagnostics were applied for prediction and for determination of predictive accuracy. The use of logistic regression models revealed no relations between the explanatory variables SN-MeGo and S-Go/N-Me and the subsequent mandibular growth pattern. Only the upper and lower parts of the gonial angle showed a minor predictive impact. A graphical evaluation of their prognostic impact by means of "receiver operating characteristics" (ROC) curves, complemented by determination of the areas under the curves, confirmed the relations discovered. Nevertheless the prognostic limits of the lateral cephalogram emerged clearly for all variables investigated.

A simple fabricated microfluidic chip for urine sample-based bladder cancer detection

“…The Youden index, which is the sum of the sensitivity and the specificity minus 1, was chosen as the criterion [54]. The cutoff points corresponding to the largest Youden index of the ROC curves were determined as optimal, the sensitivity and the specificity of these are shown in table 2.…”

Prediction of the facial growth direction with Machine Learning methods

“…In [6], the authors developed a prediction system by adding mean annual velocities with predictions derived from a polynomial model of the population's growth curve, while the authors of [14] created prediction equations for identification of favorable vs. unfavorable growth patterns. Unfortunately, a possibility of effective FG prediction was questioned by others ( [3], [11], [10]) who observed that when previously proposed methods were used in different patient samples, their predictive power was limited and clinically irrelevant.…”

The inclination of mandibular incisors revisited

“…However, their clinical significance is reduced because his study was confined to small cohorts of children with extreme growth patterns. 8 The results are, therefore, inadequate to permit clinically useful predictions. 6 In fact, when adopting the same morphological indicators that Björk 3 or Skieller et al 7 had found to explain 86% of their cases, other investigators were not able to substantiate the associations published in the original publication.…”