2012 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications 2012
DOI: 10.1109/pma.2012.6524809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the predictive capacity of five plant growth models for sugar beet

Abstract: Abstract-A lot of plant growth models coexist, with different modelling approaches and levels of complexity. In the case of sugar beet, many of them are used as predictive tools, even when they were not originally designed for this purpose.We propose the evaluation and comparison of five plant growth models that rely on the same energetic production of biomass, but with different levels of description (per plant or per square meter) and different biomass repartition (empirical or via allocation): Greenlab, LNA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Provided some basic knowledge in C++, it is very easy to implement models and to use the proposed methods: approximately 20 models of plant growth in interaction with the environment and variants are currently implemented in the platform: mostly in the GreenLab family [21] and variants of the STICS [6], CERES [32], SUNFLO [40] models, for different species. As such, it provides an interesting tool in the process of model comparison and benchmarking in the plant growth community as illustrated in [2]. Even if some specific classes of the platform are specifically derived for plant growth models (environment class, specific plant architectural class, some tools to handle experimental data ...) and the platform is so far exclusively used in the plant growth modeling community, its scope is actually broader and could find applications for other discrete dynamic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Provided some basic knowledge in C++, it is very easy to implement models and to use the proposed methods: approximately 20 models of plant growth in interaction with the environment and variants are currently implemented in the platform: mostly in the GreenLab family [21] and variants of the STICS [6], CERES [32], SUNFLO [40] models, for different species. As such, it provides an interesting tool in the process of model comparison and benchmarking in the plant growth community as illustrated in [2]. Even if some specific classes of the platform are specifically derived for plant growth models (environment class, specific plant architectural class, some tools to handle experimental data ...) and the platform is so far exclusively used in the plant growth modeling community, its scope is actually broader and could find applications for other discrete dynamic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used in this paper for the evaluation of the model were obtained from experiments conducted in 2010 by the the French Institute for Sugar Beet Research (ITB) and presented in [2]. Field experiments took place at La Selve, France, N49…”
Section: Experimental Data For Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the purpose of testing the performance of the proposed algorithm, we performed simulations based on the true experimental conditions of one experiment conducted by the French institute for Sugar beet research in 2010 (see [2] for a detailed description of the experimental protocol). Here, we present the results of simulations in two different scenarios: (i) the complete dataset is observed, that is, 320 observations (from day 1 to day 160) and (ii) we have only access to 28 observations from this dataset, green leaf and root masses measured at the 14 dates included in O 2010 : 68, 76, 83, 90, 98, 104, 110, 118, 125, 132, 139, 145, 160} , which exactly correspond to the 14 dates of measurement in the 2010 experiment.…”
Section: A Simulation Case Study For a Plant Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used for this study were obtained by the French institute for sugar beet research (ITB, Paris, France) in 2006, 2008 and 2010 with slightly different cultivars and in different locations (details of the experimental protocols can be found in [2] and [20]). For the test case, we choose 2010 as the dataset for calibration since more observation points are available compared to the other two datasets (of course, in real applications, the most aged datasets are supposed to be used for the calibration).…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%