2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the potential of MODIS satellite data to predict vegetation phenology in different biomes: An investigation using ground-based NDVI measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
190
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 359 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
11
190
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study by Hmimina et al (2013) also found good agreement between near-surface and satellite remote-sensing-derived estimates for the beginning of spring. However we found that data-driven estimates of later spring phenology from near-surface imagery, intended to represent the final stages of springtime leaf development, exhibited less correspondence to estimates derived from both visual assessments and satellite remote sensing.…”
Section: Comparison Of Phenocam Curve Fitting To Visual Assessment Anmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study by Hmimina et al (2013) also found good agreement between near-surface and satellite remote-sensing-derived estimates for the beginning of spring. However we found that data-driven estimates of later spring phenology from near-surface imagery, intended to represent the final stages of springtime leaf development, exhibited less correspondence to estimates derived from both visual assessments and satellite remote sensing.…”
Section: Comparison Of Phenocam Curve Fitting To Visual Assessment Anmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, recent results have shown that EVI from satellite remote sensing has a 2-to 3-week temporal bias, similar to GCC from tower-mounted cameras, with respect to the suite of leaf physiology measurements mentioned above (Keenan et al, 2014). Further, recent work indicates that bias between end of spring phenology at the near-surface and landscape scales may not be caused by differences in vegetation index; Hmimina et al (2013) found a similar late spring bias using NDVI from remote sensing and near-surface NDVI sensors. Camera fields of view are smaller than ground areas associated with satellite pixels.…”
Section: Comparison Of Phenocam Curve Fitting To Visual Assessment Anmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Leaf senescence is also relatively more difficult to monitor because, in contrast to budburst (which occurs in a few days and involves morphological changes that are easy to detect), leaf senescence is a slow, continuous ensemble of processes, visually progressing from the leaf coloration induced by the degradation of chlorophylls to, ultimately, leaf fall. The recent development of satellitebased and ground-based imagery (Hmimina et al 2013;Keenan et al 2014) is expected to increase the level of research effort on the leaf senescence phase. Temperature and photoperiod are regularly mentioned as the most influential environmental cues in triggering leaf senescence, but their respective contributions have not been fully elucidated (see Estrella and Menzel 2006).…”
Section: Phenology Of Leaves and Reproductive Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPOT-4 and SPOT-5 VEGETATION data time series have been effective in detecting variations in leaf phenology of deciduous broadleaved forest in different elevations, extracting a five year perpendicular vegetation index (PVI) and using a temporal unmixing method (Guyon et al 2011). A number of indices from MODIS or Landsat data, including Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), NDVI, Excess Green Index (ExG M ), and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), were evaluated in several studies (Hmimina et al 2013;Hufkens et al 2012;White et al 2014). The optimized soil-adjusted vegetation index (OS-AVI), calculated from MODIS data, was more consistent than NDVI and EVI in characterizing Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) end in evergreen needleleaved forests, encouraging its broader use (Wu et al 2014).…”
Section: Forestry Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%