2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2140/aaab9d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the pore structure of tight sandstone reservoirs based on multifractal analysis: a case study from the Kepingtage Formation in the Shuntuoguole uplift, Tarim Basin, NW China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, multifractal analysis is a multiscale method based on power-law relationships and can describe local irregular fluctuations more effectively than the monofractal method [15][16][17]. In multifractal analysis, the self-similarity measure can be regarded as the singularity strength and parameters of the multifractal spectrum through scale decomposition of interrelated fractal series [17][18][19][20]. To date, multifractal analysis has been widely used to depict the statistical properties of scale variation for studies in soil science, geosciences, and materials due to its advantage in heterogeneity analysis [21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, multifractal analysis is a multiscale method based on power-law relationships and can describe local irregular fluctuations more effectively than the monofractal method [15][16][17]. In multifractal analysis, the self-similarity measure can be regarded as the singularity strength and parameters of the multifractal spectrum through scale decomposition of interrelated fractal series [17][18][19][20]. To date, multifractal analysis has been widely used to depict the statistical properties of scale variation for studies in soil science, geosciences, and materials due to its advantage in heterogeneity analysis [21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach to estimating the D ( q )s is the so‐called box‐counting method, described, for example, by Perrier, Tarquis, and Dathe (2006), and the use of which is illustrated on a slice of a binarized 3D image taken from Monga et al (2013). This method has been widely adopted in the soil science literature (e.g., Dathe et al, 2006; Peng et al, 2018; Grau, Mendez, Tarquis, Diaz, & Saa, 2006; Jiang et al, 2018; Zhu et al, 2019). The special case D (0) corresponds to the fractal dimension of the support on which the measure is distributed, and its value is d when the support is Euclidean of dimension d .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via the multiscale characterization of 1D curves, multifractal theory has been applied to model price evolution in finance (e.g., Mandelbrot, 1999), flux intensity in meteorology (Schertzer & Lovejoy, 1989) or pore and solid size distributions in soil science (e.g., Caniago, Martin, & San José, 2002; Liu, Ostadhassan, Gentzis, & Fowler, 2019). The multifractal formalism has also helped to characterize quantitatively the spatial variability of measurements in 2D or 3D, namely the spatial variability of rainfall (Lovejoy, Schertzer, & Allaire, 2008), geometric features of medical images (e.g., Lopes & Betrouni, 2009), the variable altitude of a given surface (van Pabst & Jense, 1995), the spatial distribution of species richness in a given area (Laurie & Perrier, 2010, 2011; Perrier & Laurie, 2008), and the spatial distribution of solid and pore mass in soils or other multiscale porous media (e.g., Dathe, Perrier, & Tarquis, 2006; Kravchenko, Martin, Smucker, & Rivers, 2009; Karimpouli & Tahmasebi, 2018; Lafond, Han, Allaire, & Dutilleul, 2012; Peng, Han, Xia, & Li, 2018; Saucier & Muller, 1999; Tarquis, Gimenez, Saa, Diaz, & Gasco, 2003; Torre, Losada, & Tarquis, 2018; Jiang et al, 2018; Zhu, Zhen, & Zhang, 2019). The main goal of most multifractal modelling efforts is to provide statistical descriptors of the variability in time or space of measured properties in order to classify datasets (e.g., Posadas, Gimenez, Quiroz, & Protz, 2003) and to correlate different properties, which can be helpful in quantitatively predicting those that are difficult to measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leaves the prediction of the structural behavior and performance of sandstone as a significant challenge. Consequently, mechanical properties and failure patterns of sandstone have been the common research focus of various disciplines integrating mechanics, material science, and engineering [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%