1995
DOI: 10.1002/jhrc.1240180603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the performance of various universal and selective detectors for sulfur determination in natural gas

Abstract: Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication:• A submitted manuscript is the author's version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the GC technique is a separation technique but not an identification method, the chromatography column must be coupled to a specific detector. The most common detectors are: -Flame Ionization Detector (FID) (Adam et al, 2008;ASTM D6730, 2007;Johansen et al, 1983;Vendeuvre et al, 2005), -Sulfur or Nitrogen Chemiluminescence Detector (SCD/ NCD) (Adam et al, 2009;Dzidic et al, 1988;López García et al, 2002Revellin et al, 2005;Tuan et al, 1995), -Atomic Emission Detector (AED) (Andersson and Sielex, 1996;Depauw and Froment, 1997), -mass spectrometer (Bouyssiere et al, 2004;López García et al, 2002;Teng and Williams, 1994). GC techniques have a high separation efficient, equivalent to 2.5 10 5 theoretical plates, which allows them to identify up to 200 compounds in a mixture (Mondello et al, 2002).…”
Section: Analytical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the GC technique is a separation technique but not an identification method, the chromatography column must be coupled to a specific detector. The most common detectors are: -Flame Ionization Detector (FID) (Adam et al, 2008;ASTM D6730, 2007;Johansen et al, 1983;Vendeuvre et al, 2005), -Sulfur or Nitrogen Chemiluminescence Detector (SCD/ NCD) (Adam et al, 2009;Dzidic et al, 1988;López García et al, 2002Revellin et al, 2005;Tuan et al, 1995), -Atomic Emission Detector (AED) (Andersson and Sielex, 1996;Depauw and Froment, 1997), -mass spectrometer (Bouyssiere et al, 2004;López García et al, 2002;Teng and Williams, 1994). GC techniques have a high separation efficient, equivalent to 2.5 10 5 theoretical plates, which allows them to identify up to 200 compounds in a mixture (Mondello et al, 2002).…”
Section: Analytical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…semivolatile sulfur-containing compounds in various matrices. A number of selective detectors, such as flame photometric detector (FPD) and its variants, sulfur chemiluminescence detector (SCD), atomic emission detector, and mass spectrometry detector have been applied successfully for the selective determination of sulfur compounds [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. As sulfur selective detectors, both SCD and FPD utilize the chemiluminescent reactions of sulfur compounds in a hydrogen/air flame to achieve selective and sensitive detection of these specific compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FPD has its constraints including the lack of linearity in response due to formation of diatomic species S 2 and quenching or suppression of sulfur signal by coeluted hydrocarbons. Compared to FPD, SCD favorably produces a linear response, offers very high selectivity, and is far less susceptible to hydrocarbon interferences [6,10,11,[18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odor-causing compounds from natural gas drilling and production include hydrogen sulfide and other reduced sulfides, which can be constituents of natural gas as well as condensate (Coward and Barron, 1983;Dawodu and Meisen, 1989;Mazumdar et al, 1974;Kunkel, 1977;Tuan et al, 1995;Yuhua et al, 2006). Hydrogen sulfide is of concern because of its "rotten egg" odor, which can pose a nuisance to well site neighbors (Water Environment Federation [WEF] and American Society of Civil Engineers [ASCE], 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%