2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the ovarian reserve: is there still a place for ultrasound?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deb et al’s studies ( 16 , 24 ) support the theory that the smaller antral follicles actually reflect the ovarian potential and are most predictive of a response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Following from that, a study by Saumet et al ( 25 ) shows that 3D AFC determination and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination are equally capable of predicting the ovarian response, whereas 2D AFC determination is inadequate. This result can be explained by the fact that the smaller antral follicles (AFC if ≤6.00 mm) are mostly responsible for AMH secretion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deb et al’s studies ( 16 , 24 ) support the theory that the smaller antral follicles actually reflect the ovarian potential and are most predictive of a response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Following from that, a study by Saumet et al ( 25 ) shows that 3D AFC determination and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination are equally capable of predicting the ovarian response, whereas 2D AFC determination is inadequate. This result can be explained by the fact that the smaller antral follicles (AFC if ≤6.00 mm) are mostly responsible for AMH secretion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%