2008
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00671-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the OSOM Trichomonas Rapid Test versus Wet Preparation Examination for Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis Vaginitis in Specimens from Women with a Low Prevalence of Infection

Abstract: The OSOM Trichomonas rapid test (OSOM Trich) was compared to the wet preparation examination (WP) for the detection of Trichomonas vaginalis vaginitis in women with a low prevalence of infection. A total of 19/1,009 (2%) women had T. vaginalis infection. OSOM Trich had very good performance, with sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 94.7, 100, 99.9, 100, and 99.9%, respectively. The implementation of OSOM Trich would decrease labor costs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This information would be clinically useful when evaluating vaginal discharge and lower genital tract symptoms. Microscopy is the most common method used to diagnose trichomoniasis, but the sensitivity is poor (55%; 35 to 77%) (13)(14)(15)(16). The presence of leukorrhea in the absence of motile trichomonads could potentially be presumed to be cervicitis and empirically treated without further evaluation for Trichomonas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information would be clinically useful when evaluating vaginal discharge and lower genital tract symptoms. Microscopy is the most common method used to diagnose trichomoniasis, but the sensitivity is poor (55%; 35 to 77%) (13)(14)(15)(16). The presence of leukorrhea in the absence of motile trichomonads could potentially be presumed to be cervicitis and empirically treated without further evaluation for Trichomonas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICT is based on the detection of T.vaginalis antigens rather than the live whole parasite, therefore such false positivity results are likely to occur [9]. ICT, having high levels of sensitivity and specificity, has been recommended by others as a good screening test especially for low prevalence settings like in Sri Lanka [9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 The sensitivity and specificity has been reported to be 80-94% and greater than 95%, respectively, depending on the comparator. 27,28,34,35 This test requires no instrumentation and provides a result within 30 min and is a suitable alternative to culture or molecular testing. Although these tests are more sensitive than those requiring vaginal wet preparation, false positives might occur, especially in populations with a low prevalence of disease, so consideration should be given to confirming positives in that situation.…”
Section: Point Of Care Tests Level Of Evidence: Iib Bmentioning
confidence: 99%