2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12937-018-0380-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the online Beverage Frequency Questionnaire (BFQ)

Abstract: BackgroundThe contribution of beverages to overall diet is of increasing interest to researchers and policymakers, particularly in terms of consumption of drinks high in added sugars; however, few tools to assess beverage intake have been developed and evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the relative validity of a new online Beverage Frequency Questionnaire (BFQ) among young adults in Canada.MethodsA cross-sectional relative validation study was conducted among young adults aged 16–30 years (n = 50). Parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike existing literature that tends to focus on specific forms of promotion (for example, television advertising [27]), we included a broad range of promotion exposures. Using the validated BFQ [33] increased the internal validity of our results. However, recruitment using non-probability sampling limited the ability of our analyses to provide nationally representative findings, as did sociodemographic differences between participants in the total and analytical sample.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike existing literature that tends to focus on specific forms of promotion (for example, television advertising [27]), we included a broad range of promotion exposures. Using the validated BFQ [33] increased the internal validity of our results. However, recruitment using non-probability sampling limited the ability of our analyses to provide nationally representative findings, as did sociodemographic differences between participants in the total and analytical sample.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The seven-day Beverage Frequency Questionnaire (BFQ) included in the study was used to derive an SSB consumption variable. The BFQ is a validated mode of dietary recall [33], which uses photographs to prompt respondents to recall the number and size of 22 types of drinks, including caloric and non-caloric, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. First, participants were asked to report the number of drinks they had consumed within each beverage category in the past 7 days.…”
Section: Sugar-sweetened Beverage Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beverage intake was examined using the Beverage Frequency Questionnaire (BFQ) ( 32 ), adapted for each country. A version of the BFQ has been examined relative to 7-d food records among young adults aged 16–30 y in Canada, showing moderate to high correlation and agreement between estimates of frequency of consumption and total volume of each of the beverage categories consumed for 14 of 17 beverage categories (between 0.46 and 0.91 for the number of drinks, 0.48 and 0.95 for volume) and lower correlation for 3 of 17 categories (coffee with cream or sugar, specialty coffee, and hard alcohol with no mix) ( 32 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A version of the BFQ has been examined relative to 7-d food records among young adults aged 16–30 y in Canada, showing moderate to high correlation and agreement between estimates of frequency of consumption and total volume of each of the beverage categories consumed for 14 of 17 beverage categories (between 0.46 and 0.91 for the number of drinks, 0.48 and 0.95 for volume) and lower correlation for 3 of 17 categories (coffee with cream or sugar, specialty coffee, and hard alcohol with no mix) ( 32 ). The BFQ had moderate to good correlations for aggregate categories of SSBs (0.53 for the number of drinks and 0.54 for volume), sugary drinks (0.63 for the number of drinks and 0.55 for volume), alcoholic beverages (0.58 for the number of drinks and 0.78 for volume), and all drinks (0.62 for the number of drinks and 0.59 for volume) ( 32 ). The BFQ used in the current study was modified from the original BFQ to examine frequency of intake of 22 beverage categories over the past 7 d. Categories were based on commonly and episodically consumed beverages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Beverage Frequency Questionnaire is a 7-day food record that assesses consumption for 17 beverage categories, including caloric and non-caloric beverages 24. For each beverage category, respondents report the number of drinks and the usual portion size, using category-specific images of beverage containers, adapted from the ASA24 dietary recall 25.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%