2017
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.22065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the NMP22 BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundWe examined the usefulness of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer.Materials and MethodsA literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The diagnostic accuracy of the NMP22 BladderChek test was evaluated via pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under curve (AUC). Inter-study heterogeneity was explored using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The NMP22 BC test kit (Matritech Inc.; Newton, MA, USA) is a quantitative test used for patient follow-up, whereas the NMP22 BladderChek test ® (Matritech Inc.; Newton, MA, USA) is qualitative and used for both follow-up and initial diagnosis, in symptomatic patients [ 85 , 86 , 87 ]. Concerning sensitivity and specificity, the quantitative test has 69% and 77%, while the qualitative has 58% and 88%, respectively [ 64 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 88 , 89 ]. When compared to urinary cytology, the sensitivity of NMP22 was higher (70% versus 40%), albeit specificity was lower (81% versus 97%) [ 28 ].…”
Section: Liquid Biopsy As a Source Of Biomarkers For Bladder Cancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMP22 BC test kit (Matritech Inc.; Newton, MA, USA) is a quantitative test used for patient follow-up, whereas the NMP22 BladderChek test ® (Matritech Inc.; Newton, MA, USA) is qualitative and used for both follow-up and initial diagnosis, in symptomatic patients [ 85 , 86 , 87 ]. Concerning sensitivity and specificity, the quantitative test has 69% and 77%, while the qualitative has 58% and 88%, respectively [ 64 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 88 , 89 ]. When compared to urinary cytology, the sensitivity of NMP22 was higher (70% versus 40%), albeit specificity was lower (81% versus 97%) [ 28 ].…”
Section: Liquid Biopsy As a Source Of Biomarkers For Bladder Cancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional non-invasive urinary assays have been developed, which could help to minimize the invasive procedure of cystoscopy and reduce its economic burden (for an overview see: [8]). Although such assays have been shown to increase the sensitivity of urine cytology, they have not been widely adopted in routine practice: either they are characterized by cost-intensive performances, like UroVysion [9], or failed as point of-care tests due to limited sensitivity or specificity, such as the NMP22-based "BladderCheck TM Test" [10,11]. Given that, none of the currently available urinary biomarkers that have been approved by the FDA can absolutely be recommended as a stand-alone test to replace cystoscopy in the clinic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, this proximity makes urine a valuable resource for monitoring urinary tract cancers [180]. Currently, bladder cancer relies on the detection of urinary NMP22 [181] by ELISA but this test suffers from low sensitivity. A second ELISA test for BTA [182] lacks specificity since the protein is also detected at high concentrations in blood that would yield a false-positive result in patients with poor filtration performance.…”
Section: Urine-based Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%