2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program's recommended chest compression depth using computerized tomography imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When we apply the recommended compression depth according to the current guidelines (at least 5 cm, but not exceeding 6 cm), the remained IT was 3.3–4.3 cm in controls and 1.0–2.0 cm in PE patients. Some previous studies defined the remained IT of less than 10 mm as a risk depth in children for the risk of myocardial injury 12 13. The range of 1.0–2.0 cm of remained IT in PE patients would result in intrathoracic organ damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we apply the recommended compression depth according to the current guidelines (at least 5 cm, but not exceeding 6 cm), the remained IT was 3.3–4.3 cm in controls and 1.0–2.0 cm in PE patients. Some previous studies defined the remained IT of less than 10 mm as a risk depth in children for the risk of myocardial injury 12 13. The range of 1.0–2.0 cm of remained IT in PE patients would result in intrathoracic organ damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, providers vary widely in the depth achieved during a 2-min paradigm, and some are unlikely to achieve the ‘desired one-third anterior posterior diameter depth’ 13. Moreover, significant decay occurs over time particularly with a 5:1 and 15:2 ratio and for all ratios during the last phase of compressions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Compressions are delivered on the lower third of the sternum [153][154][155][156] to a depth of approximately one third of the anteriorposterior diameter of the chest (Class IIb, LOE C-LD). 157 Two techniques have been described: compression with 2 thumbs with the fingers encircling the chest and supporting the back (the 2-thumb technique) or compression with 2 fingers with a second hand supporting the back (the 2-finger technique). Because the 2-thumb technique generates higher blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure with less rescuer fatigue, the 2 thumb-encircling hands technique is suggested as the preferred method [158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172] (Class IIb, LOE C-LD).…”
Section: Chest Compressions Nrp 605 Nrp 895 Nrp 738 Nrp 862mentioning
confidence: 99%