1996
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199609000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Neer System of Classification of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Computerized Tomographic Scans and Plain Radiographs*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
171
1
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
8
171
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Like Bernstein et al (1996), we found that CT, together with plain radiographs, did not make fracture classification more consistent. There was a moderate agreement between the observers when using the Neer classification, but only a fair agreement with the A 0 classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like Bernstein et al (1996), we found that CT, together with plain radiographs, did not make fracture classification more consistent. There was a moderate agreement between the observers when using the Neer classification, but only a fair agreement with the A 0 classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, the use of CT in our study did not improve the classification, when compared with previous studies using plain radiographs (Siebenrock andGerber 1993, Sidor et al 1993). Bernstein et al (1996) found that CT, added to plain radiographs, increased intraobserver reliability slightly, but did not improve interobserver reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Improvements in our understanding and management of displaced greater tuberosity fractures will depend on improved interobserver reliability in the classification of fractures. CT scan, especially with three-dimensional reconstruction, may be a valuable tool in improving our ability to classify fractures adequately and improve the validity of comparison series such as this [1]. We can improve upon arthroscopic techniques so that fractures with even larger fragments, and with greater displacements, can be adequately managed arthroscopically.…”
Section: Where Do We Need To Go?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,25 On the other hand, new progress in PHF studies, especially in vascularization, allows the definition of important new characteristics for treatment decision-making. [26][27][28][29][30] Because important new concepts for prognosis and treatment of PHF do not easily fit in past classification systems, some authors have proposed new imaging techniques 8,12 or new functional classifications. 14 Since 2003, new systems of fracture classifications have been published.…”
Section: Background On the Diagnosis And Classification Of Phfmentioning
confidence: 99%