Abstract:Background: To determine the level of perceived pain after different types of periodontal/oral surgical procedures, and the differences in patients' selection of pain management, over the counter (OTC) versus opioid, based on procedure type. Methods: Patients undergoing surgical procedures were asked to complete a pain questionnaire at four time points: 1) before surgery 2) first dose of analgesic at home, 3) 24 hours postoperatively, and 4) 72 hours postoperatively. The questionnaire consisted of numerical an… Show more
“…With this increased awareness at the predoctoral level, awareness increased throughout all the faculty to include part-time faculty at CUSDM. In addition, verbal dissemination of the results from the Graduate Periodontics self-reported questionnaire for postoperative pain study which demonstrated that the majority of periodontal/oral surgeries do not need a postsurgical opioid pain prescription 27 had an impact on prescribing habits. Review of the prescribing trends in 2019 showed another drop.…”
PurposeThe University of Colorado School of Dental Medicine took 5 distinct actions to mitigate the amount of opioids prescribed at the dental school between the years 2016‐2020.MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated a comprehensive 5‐step quality improvement strategy which was implemented to decrease opioid prescribing. a) development of a Dental Pain Management Protocol, b) implementation of the protocol with pre‐doctoral students, c) incorporating the results of a Master's project that determined the actual postoperative pain after periodontal/oral surgical procedures, d) development of a favorite electronic prescription list, and e) creation of patient instructions to allow for information on nonopioid analgesic use after dental procedures to be disseminated to the patient.ResultsThere was a significant decrease (P = 0.05) in the opioid prescribing trend with the implementation of these 5 actions, resulting in an overall 68.8% decrease for prescription writing of opioids and a 78.6% decrease of opioid pills over this 3 year period.ConclusionSimple guidelines and protocols resulted in a drastic decrease in opioid prescribing, with limited negative feedback from faculty and patients.
“…With this increased awareness at the predoctoral level, awareness increased throughout all the faculty to include part-time faculty at CUSDM. In addition, verbal dissemination of the results from the Graduate Periodontics self-reported questionnaire for postoperative pain study which demonstrated that the majority of periodontal/oral surgeries do not need a postsurgical opioid pain prescription 27 had an impact on prescribing habits. Review of the prescribing trends in 2019 showed another drop.…”
PurposeThe University of Colorado School of Dental Medicine took 5 distinct actions to mitigate the amount of opioids prescribed at the dental school between the years 2016‐2020.MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated a comprehensive 5‐step quality improvement strategy which was implemented to decrease opioid prescribing. a) development of a Dental Pain Management Protocol, b) implementation of the protocol with pre‐doctoral students, c) incorporating the results of a Master's project that determined the actual postoperative pain after periodontal/oral surgical procedures, d) development of a favorite electronic prescription list, and e) creation of patient instructions to allow for information on nonopioid analgesic use after dental procedures to be disseminated to the patient.ResultsThere was a significant decrease (P = 0.05) in the opioid prescribing trend with the implementation of these 5 actions, resulting in an overall 68.8% decrease for prescription writing of opioids and a 78.6% decrease of opioid pills over this 3 year period.ConclusionSimple guidelines and protocols resulted in a drastic decrease in opioid prescribing, with limited negative feedback from faculty and patients.
“…One reason for this relationship is that instrumentation becomes more difficult in deeper pockets due to poor access, decreased curette efficiency, and complex root anatomy 13,14 . Surgical access allows more effective calculus removal 12 ; however, conventional approaches are often associated with post‐operative discomfort, gingival recession, and tooth sensitivity 15,16 . Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques, with limited incisions and flap access, have been developed to mitigate these potential side effects, but visualization of root surfaces can be difficult 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Surgical access allows more effective calculus removal 12 ; however, conventional approaches are often associated with post-operative discomfort, gingival recession, and tooth sensitivity. 15,16 Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques, with limited incisions and flap access, have been developed to mitigate these potential side effects, but visualization of root surfaces can be difficult. 17 Aids including surgical telescopes, surgical microscopes, and glass fiber endoscopes have been used to improve visualization in MIS, though each of these aids has been associated with difficulties of either access, magnification, or blurred imaging.…”
BackgroundThe purpose of this randomized, controlled split‐mouth study was to evaluate a videoscope as a visual adjunct to scaling and root planing when utilized in combination with minimally invasive surgery.MethodsTwenty‐five pairs (89 interproximal surfaces) of periodontally hopeless teeth planned for extraction were scaled and root planed with minimal surgical access using surgical loupes (control) or adjunctive use of a videoscope (test). Teeth were extracted with minimal trauma, stained with methylene blue, and photographed with a digital microscope for analysis. The primary outcome of residual calculus was calculated as a percentage of the total interproximal area of interest. Secondary outcomes included treatment time, as well as residual calculus according to probing depth, tooth location, and treatment date. Data were analyzed using Student's paired t‐tests, two‐way analyses of variance, and Spearman's correlation tests.ResultsResidual calculus area was 2.61% on control and 2.71% on test surfaces with no significant difference between groups. Subgroup analysis showed no difference in residual calculus between groups at moderate or deep sites. Treatment time per surface was significantly longer in the test group compared to the control group. Treatment order, tooth location, and operator experience did not significantly affect the primary outcome.ConclusionsThough the videoscope provided excellent visual access, it did not improve the efficacy of root planing for flat interproximal surfaces during minimally invasive periodontal surgery. Small amounts of calculus remain after instrumentation even with minimal surgical access and when root surfaces appear visually clean and tactilely smooth.
“…Thus, there is greater concern for adverse events and drug interactions in this population. The pain intensity level following implant placement is generally less than dental impaction surgery ( Al-Khabbaz et al, 2007 ; Al-Bayati et al, 2021 ), so over-the-counter (OTC) doses of NSAIDs and/or acetaminophen are an option for pain management in these patients. OTC dosing is more conservative than prescription dosing mainly for safety reasons ( Hersh et al, 2007 ), and these lower dosages along with the shorter maximum durations of use (no more than 10-day) contribute to a side-effect profile no different from placebo ( DeArmond et al, 1995 ; Kellstein et al, 1999 ).…”
Introduction: Post-surgical pain following dental implant placement surgery is typically managed with non-opioid analgesics, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen. However, the comparative analgesic efficacy of over-the-counter doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen in implant patients is unknown. Therefore, we compared the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of naproxen sodium and acetaminophen after surgical placement of one or two dental implants.Methods: Adult patients were treated with naproxen sodium (440 mg loading dose +220 mg q8h, n = 15) or acetaminophen (1,000 mg q6h—max daily dose 3,000 mg, n = 15) for 3 days after implant placement in a randomized, double-blind design. Pain was assessed on a 0–10 scale every 20 min for 6 h after study medication treatment. Tramadol (50 mg) was available as a rescue medication. Plasma and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were collected prior to the surgery and 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, and 72 h after surgery for quantification of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-1β levels.Results: Pain scores were significantly lower in patients treated with naproxen sodium compared to those treated with acetaminophen. Inflammatory mediator levels in plasma and gingival crevicular fluid increased after surgery and returned to near baseline levels by 72 h. Plasma IL-6 levels were significantly lower 6 h after surgery in patients treated with naproxen sodium compared to acetaminophen. No differences in inflammatory mediator concentrations in gingival crevicular fluid were observed between the treatment groups. The number of implants placed and body mass index (BMI) influenced inflammatory mediator concentrations in plasma and gingival crevicular fluid, respectively.Discussion: Naproxen sodium was more effective than acetaminophen in reducing post-operative pain and systemic inflammation following surgical placement of one or two dental implants. Further studies are needed to determine whether these findings are applicable to more complex implant cases and how they affect clinical outcomes following implant placement.Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04694300
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.