2020
DOI: 10.1002/hed.26424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the modified Pittsburgh classification for predicting the disease‐free survival outcome of squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal

Abstract: Background: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the external auditory canal (EAC) is a rare disease, which is commonly classified with the modified This work represents an independent research supported by the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A nationwide study by Nabuurs et al evaluated the modified Pittsburgh classification and deemed it acceptable. However, for T4 tumours they suggest a revised classification with other predictive factors such as surgical margins 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A nationwide study by Nabuurs et al evaluated the modified Pittsburgh classification and deemed it acceptable. However, for T4 tumours they suggest a revised classification with other predictive factors such as surgical margins 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nationwide study by Nabuurs et al evaluated the modified Pittsburgh classification and deemed it acceptable. However, for T4 tumours they suggest a revised classifi- cation with other predictive factors such as surgical margins 27 . Zanoletti et al also suggest a prognosis scoring system for T4 tumours, including dural involvement and histological grade as negative prognosticators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the AJCC attempt to improve the prognostic value of available classifications and the wide diffusion of the revised Pittsburgh staging system, in the present homogeneous series of TBSCC, both systems resulted only acceptable in terms of effectiveness of the discrimination, according to Hosmer–Lemeshow scale 23 . Every effort must be made in an attempt to produce new staging modalities for TBSCC with greater prognostic capacity 27–31 . This appears to be particularly relevant in the pre‐treatment setting, relying on clinical and radiological findings, and on biopsies 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In both T3 and T4 cases, the limits of tumor extension should be accurately assessed preoperatively through thin-slice contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging [ 29 ]. The bone cutting line can then be carefully considered to achieve negative margin resection ( Figure 7 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%