2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the mechanical properties, durability and drying shrinkage of the mortar reinforced with polyacrylonitrile microfibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays several alternatives that allow a reduction in the porosity percentage in concrete have been established, such as the inclusion of additives, the setting of low w/c ratios, the inclusion of fibers or the application of pozzolans [19,20]. Regarding the last alternative, SF is the most used pozzolan for improving the properties of concrete and reducing the porosity [21] when the ITZ is densified; this can react with the cement hydration products (calcium hydroxide—CH–) to form calcium silicate hydrate (CSH), which thereby improves the mechanical strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays several alternatives that allow a reduction in the porosity percentage in concrete have been established, such as the inclusion of additives, the setting of low w/c ratios, the inclusion of fibers or the application of pozzolans [19,20]. Regarding the last alternative, SF is the most used pozzolan for improving the properties of concrete and reducing the porosity [21] when the ITZ is densified; this can react with the cement hydration products (calcium hydroxide—CH–) to form calcium silicate hydrate (CSH), which thereby improves the mechanical strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the control mortar, the apparent porosity of P1, P2, P3, and P4 decreased by 1.44%, 2.65%, 3.20%, and 4.74%, respectively, at 28 d. Different authors attribute the decrease in porosities of mortar to the filling effect of the microfibers. e higher the addition of PPF, the lower the porosity, because the internal pores (due to the filling effect) and the capillary pores (generated by the evaporation of water) are reduced [46]. Compared with the control group, the water absorption of P1, P2, P3, and P4 groups decreased by 1.48%, 2.94%, 4.49%, and 5.34%, respectively, at 28 d. e low water absorption values can be attributed to the decrease in porosity.…”
Section: Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e increase of compressive strength can be attributed to the ability of PPF to interrupt the initiation of microcracks, deviate their direction or avoid the extension of cracks, absorb tensions, decrease porosity, etc. [46,64,65]. Figure 7 shows the drying shrinkage of all mixtures over the recording period of 56 days.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Steel fibers are very expensive and produce corrosion [29], glass fibers are very fragile and do not transmit elasticity to the mortar, [30], therefore, polymer fibers are the best option, they are produced at a low cost, they have high elastic properties and they are easy to place in the mortar mixture, improving its dispersion [31], in addition to being the least studied in the construction engineering area. Some of the fibers used as reinforcement of cementitious materials are polypropylene fibers [32], polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers [33], polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers [34], among others, but few studies have been done with polyacrylonitrile (PAN) reinforcing fibers [35]. PAN is a polymer widely used in the industry, and has been widely used for the synthesis of microfibers because it has good mechanical properties, easy spinning, chemical stability and high durability [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%