2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-10147-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the mechanical properties of fully integrated 3D printed polymeric sandwich structures with auxetic cores: experimental and numerical assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Young's Modulus (MPa) Poisson's Ratio Density (kg/m 3 ) Pear Fruit (Ankara) [15] 3.248 0.427 1032 Poplar Wood [15] 8400 0.318 4000 ABS (3D-printed) [12] 1900 0.350 940 Cardboard [26] 656 0.251 800 Rubber [26] Mooney-Rivlin parameters 1000 Bio-inspired honeycomb structures are commonly used in the literature due to their good properties in impact-loading without compromising weight [27]. The corrugated shape is also well documented and generally used in cardboard boxes for transportation purposes [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Young's Modulus (MPa) Poisson's Ratio Density (kg/m 3 ) Pear Fruit (Ankara) [15] 3.248 0.427 1032 Poplar Wood [15] 8400 0.318 4000 ABS (3D-printed) [12] 1900 0.350 940 Cardboard [26] 656 0.251 800 Rubber [26] Mooney-Rivlin parameters 1000 Bio-inspired honeycomb structures are commonly used in the literature due to their good properties in impact-loading without compromising weight [27]. The corrugated shape is also well documented and generally used in cardboard boxes for transportation purposes [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the design stage of the structure, the energy absorption should be maximized so that energy is transferred to the package instead of the fruit. Various auxetic geometric structure designs can be adopted, such as arrowhead, anti-tetra chiral, re-entrant, and honeycomb, as investigated by Najafi et al [12]. In this paper, investigations and simulations of a honeycomb structure will be conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unique behavior renders them promising candidate for a variety of lightweight engineering applications, such as automobiles [3], compression endurance [4] impact-resistant armors [5], crash applications [6] and biomedical applications [7]. These structures have many variants, Reentrant, honeycomb, chiral, and gyroid are some pertinent examples [8,9]. The advent of numerical controlled technology has facilitated the physical realization of such complicated structures [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technologies that allow for flexible design and manufacturing of the inner core shapes in sandwich structures are needed. Recent advancements in 3D printing or additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have enabled the production of cellular materials with more complex architectures [16][17][18][19][20]. Researchers have recently conducted studies on various core topologies of additive manufacturing-produced sandwich structures, examining their behavior under different types of loadings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zoumaki et al [22] fabricated biodegradable starch-based sandwich materials by using maize starch-based films as skins and 3Dprinted polylactic filaments (PLA) as the core, and investigated the tensile properties of the skins through the preparation of conventional and nanocomposite films with various reinforcement combinations. Najafi et al [18] performed a study to examine and compare the mechanical characteristics, such as energy absorption, Young's modulus and compressive strength of fully integrated 3D printed polymeric sandwich structures with different auxetic core topologies (anti-tetra chiral, re-entrant, arrowhead), as well as conventional honeycomb structures, fabricated using the FDM 3D printing method. Additionally, Choudry et al [23] conducted a comprehensive investigation involving both numerical simulations and experimental tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%