Evaluation of the maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different skeletal classes using cone beam computed tomography

Aşantoğrol, Firdevs; Etöz, Meryem; Topsakal, Kubra Gulnur; Can, Fatma Ezgi

doi:10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.529

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Along with this, a few additional complications such as root resorption, loss of tooth vitality and perforation of sinus membrane further add to the complexity of the process. 13 A systematic review by Sun et al 8 concluded that presently no evidence-based protocol could be recommended to guide orthodontic tooth movement through the maxillary sinus, however, application of light continuous force appears to be practical and safe.…”

Section: Orthodontic Implications 411 Orthodontic Tooth Movement Thro...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions and volume in different sagittal and vertical facial types: A CBCT based study

Jain,

Nimbalkar,

Datana

et al. 2023

JCO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study was carried out to evaluate the dimensions and volume of maxillary sinus along with its distribution among different sagittal and vertical skeletal facial types.A sample of 90 patients was segregated into three sagittal groups based on ANB angle which was further subdivided into three vertical subgroups based on SN-GoGn angle using NNT software. The volumetric assessment was carried out usingHoros software while the linear measurements were performed on CBCT images analysed in NNT software. The inter-group statistical comparison of means of continuous variables was done using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s multiple group comparisons.The maxillary sinus volume did not differ significantly across different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns, the mean sinus volume being 13.08 (+/- 5.38) cu mm among the study population. The maxillary sinus length in Class I skeletal pattern was 3.65 cm (Hyperdivergent group), 3.64 cm (normodivergent group) and 3.52 cm (Hypodivergent group).The distribution of maxillary sinus dimensions did not differ significantly across the different skeletal and vertical facial types. The only statistically significant finding was the greater maxillary sinus length in all three types of vertical skeletal patterns of Class I as compared to Class III malocclusion.

show abstract

Section: Orthodontic Implications 411 Orthodontic Tooth Movement Thro...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions and volume in different sagittal and vertical facial types: A CBCT based study

Jain,

Nimbalkar,

Datana

et al. 2023

JCO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, the facial skeleton dimensions and maxillary sinus are closely related. The maxillary sinus has been linked to midfacial growth and contouring, as its shape and dimension reflect the development of bony structures [12]. Alberti [13] assumed that a 'flat face' was due to a concave, small frontal wall of the maxillary sinus, whereas a 'round face' was due to a convex, larger frontal wall.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Alberti [13] assumed that a 'flat face' was due to a concave, small frontal wall of the maxillary sinus, whereas a 'round face' was due to a convex, larger frontal wall. The maxillary sinus can affect the maxillary position concerning the base of the skull, and the anteroposterior direction of maxillary development can be affected [12]. Some researchers have discovered a strong correlation between mandible length and maxillary sinus dimension [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of maxillary sinus diameters in Chinese and Yemeni patients with skeletal malocclusion

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This study aimed to compare the maxillary sinus dimensions and surface area in accordance with skeletal malocclusion, gender and ethnicity factors in a sample of Chinese and Yemeni patients. Methods This cross-sectional study analysed 180 maxillary sinuses using 180 lateral cephalometric radiographs. The patients were subdivided into two ethnic groups: Chinese and Yemeni. Each ethnic group comprised 90 patients, and men and women were divided equally. Each ethnic group was classified into three skeletal classes using ANB and Wits appraisal (skeletal Classes I, II and III). Pearson’s correlation coefficient was also used to assess the relationship between maxillary sinus dimensions and cephalometric parameters. Results Men had larger maxillary sinuses than women; skeletal Class II had a higher length and surface area increase than other skeletal classes, although skeletal Classes I and II were almost equal in height. Except for the maxillary sinus length, none of these findings were statistically significant. The maxillary sinuses in Chinese are larger than those in Yemenis (P = 0.000). These variables were positively correlated with SNA, SNB and Co–A. The maxillary sinus length and Co–Gn were positively correlated. The NA–APO and NA–FH angles were also correlated with the maxillary sinus surface area. However, the gonial and GoGn–Sn angles negatively affected the maxillary sinus dimension and surface area. Conclusions Men had larger maxillary sinuses than women in both ethnic groups, and Chinese individuals had larger maxillary sinuses than Yemenis. Skeletal Class II malocclusion of both ethnicities had larger maxillary sinus dimensions. Furthermore, the maxillary sinus dimensions correlated with cephalometric parameters.

show abstract

The Relationship between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Different Cephalometric Characteristics in Orthodontics

Alqahtani,

Basuhail,

Alsulaimani

et al. 2023

Contemporary Clinical Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the maxillary sinus volume (MSV) in both genders in a Saudi sample and among different skeletal patterns. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 52 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 18 years or older individuals with complete dentition and healthy medical history. MSV was measured as the mean value of both sides in cubic millimeters (mm3) using OnDemand three-dimensional™ Dental. Cephalometric tracings were conducted on cephalograms obtained from CBCT scans. The beta, A × B, and Frankfort-mandibular plane angles were selected to determine the sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns of the study subjects. Descriptive statistics and other tests were conducted. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: Fifty-two CBCT scans were included in this study (23 males and 29 females), with a mean age of 36 (±14) years. The mean MSV was 14887 (±5030.79) mm3. Males had statistically significantly larger MSV (16517 ± 5335 mm3) compared with females (13595 ± 4,452 mm3) (P = 0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in MSV among all other cephalometric measurements (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The MSV in the studied Saudi sample was larger among males. However, different skeletal patterns have no statistically significant differences in MSV.

show abstract

Evaluation of the maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different skeletal classes using cone beam computed tomography

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions and volume in different sagittal and vertical facial types: A CBCT based study

Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions and volume in different sagittal and vertical facial types: A CBCT based study

A comparison of maxillary sinus diameters in Chinese and Yemeni patients with skeletal malocclusion

The Relationship between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Different Cephalometric Characteristics in Orthodontics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About