2002
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.40.12.4528-4530.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Makromed Dipstick Assay versus PCR for Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in Returned Travelers

Abstract: Microscopy has been the traditional reference standard for malaria diagnosis. However, difficulty in maintaining the required technical skills, particularly in areas where malaria is not endemic, has prompted the development of rapid nonmicroscopic diagnostic assays based on the detection of malaria parasite antigen in whole blood. In this study, we evaluated the performance of one such device, the Makromed dipstick test, blindly compared to PCR and microscopy for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All the patients positive by microscopy were also positive by PCR, whatever the Plasmodium species. When compared to the set of the requests, the gain of sensitivity was 4.4 % (range: from 0 to + 11 %) (Rubio et al, 1999;Filisetti et al, 2002;Morassin et al, 2002;Richardson et al, 2002;de Monbrison et al, 2003;Padley et al, 2003;Patsoula et al, 2003;Perandin et al, 2003;Calderaro et al, 2004;Fabre et al, 2004;Perandin et al, 2004;Rougemont et al, 2004;Whiley et al, 2004;Machouart et al, 2006;Vo et al, 2007). This improvement in sensitivity affected mainly falciparum malaria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the patients positive by microscopy were also positive by PCR, whatever the Plasmodium species. When compared to the set of the requests, the gain of sensitivity was 4.4 % (range: from 0 to + 11 %) (Rubio et al, 1999;Filisetti et al, 2002;Morassin et al, 2002;Richardson et al, 2002;de Monbrison et al, 2003;Padley et al, 2003;Patsoula et al, 2003;Perandin et al, 2003;Calderaro et al, 2004;Fabre et al, 2004;Perandin et al, 2004;Rougemont et al, 2004;Whiley et al, 2004;Machouart et al, 2006;Vo et al, 2007). This improvement in sensitivity affected mainly falciparum malaria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Der Antikörper kreuzreagiert mit Plasmodium vivax, allerdings mit geringerer Sensitivität. Bei Verwenden von Antikör-pern gegen das histidine-rich-protein II von Plasmodium falciparum wurde eine Sensitivität von 97 % und Spezifität von 96 % bei Reiserückkehrern erreicht [29].…”
Section: C) Plasmodien-antigen-nachweisunclassified
“…The antibody cross-reacts with P. vivax, but at a low sensitivity. When antibodies were used against histidine-rich protein II of P. falciparum, a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 96% were obtained in travel returnees [29]. Depending on the exposure, a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 99% can be reached for P. falciparum.…”
Section: Plasmodium Antigen Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%