2001
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-15498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Liver for Metastatic Disease

Abstract: Metastatic disease of the liver accounts for the vast majority of detected liver masses. In patients with suspected metastatic disease, cross-sectional imaging with ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is critical. In the group of patients undergoing evaluation for hepatic surgery, it is even more important to optimize techniques to detect and localize metastatic disease. With improvements in technology and contrast agents, there are several approaches to imaging the l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognition of a hypoechoic halo or rim surrounding an echogenic or isoechoic liver mass, suggested probable malignancy, this was also been mentioned in previous studies [52,53] and masses with this morphologic characteristic were provoked confirmatory imaging with computed tomographic (CT) scans ,some showed similar findings and another showed different results as presented in table (7) .Multiple hypoechoic masses in the liver most often suggest metastases. [54]This was seen in our results and it was also diagnosed well in the contrast enhanced CT scans. By comparison, the common appearance of abdomino pelvic mass was diagnosed ultrasonographically with good evaluation of adenexia, it was found as a solid, uniformly echogenic mass, possibly showing increased enhancement deep to the mass, is so well recognized in (1(2%) of the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 1(2%) of the cases affected with metastases, the identification of such a mass rule out the need for CT imaging where the diagnoses was done regarding to its findings, similar results were reported in previous study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Recognition of a hypoechoic halo or rim surrounding an echogenic or isoechoic liver mass, suggested probable malignancy, this was also been mentioned in previous studies [52,53] and masses with this morphologic characteristic were provoked confirmatory imaging with computed tomographic (CT) scans ,some showed similar findings and another showed different results as presented in table (7) .Multiple hypoechoic masses in the liver most often suggest metastases. [54]This was seen in our results and it was also diagnosed well in the contrast enhanced CT scans. By comparison, the common appearance of abdomino pelvic mass was diagnosed ultrasonographically with good evaluation of adenexia, it was found as a solid, uniformly echogenic mass, possibly showing increased enhancement deep to the mass, is so well recognized in (1(2%) of the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 1(2%) of the cases affected with metastases, the identification of such a mass rule out the need for CT imaging where the diagnoses was done regarding to its findings, similar results were reported in previous study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The sensitivity of pre-operative imaging studies has improved up to 60e75% with spiral CT and 80e85% with MR [1], but the combination of diagnostic laparoscopy and intra-operative ultrasound (LIOUS) has achieved 90e96% accuracy in the staging of liver and pancreatic malignancies. This allows patients who are not candidates for curative surgery to be spared the ordeal of laparotomy [2e4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chest radiography is insensitive in detecting mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathies because of structure overlapping and inadequate soft-tissue contrast. Ultrasonography can visualize superficial hepatic structures well; however, this technique is relatively operator-dependent and has inherent problems in differentiating between benign and metastatic tumors (7). Finally, skeletal scintigraphy appears to be insensitive for detecting early bone or bone marrow metastasis (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%