2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/5/052008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the LINCOM wind field reconstruction method with simulations and full-scale measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method provides a trade-off between conventional wind field reconstructions that require strong wind field assumptions and time-consuming physics-based solvers. Even though this study could benefit from full 3D wind fields, POD analysis of the line-of-sight measurements from a turbine-mounted lidar capable of high spatial coverage is considered reasonable because (1) the line-of-sight measurements are dominated by the longitudinal velocity component for turbine-mounted lidars (Harris et al, 2007): (2) it is quite challenging to extract the full 3D wind field information from line-of-sight measurements (Kidambi Sekar et al, 2018) of turbine response dominating over the contributions of the lateral and vertical components when the turbine is aligned with the inflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our method provides a trade-off between conventional wind field reconstructions that require strong wind field assumptions and time-consuming physics-based solvers. Even though this study could benefit from full 3D wind fields, POD analysis of the line-of-sight measurements from a turbine-mounted lidar capable of high spatial coverage is considered reasonable because (1) the line-of-sight measurements are dominated by the longitudinal velocity component for turbine-mounted lidars (Harris et al, 2007): (2) it is quite challenging to extract the full 3D wind field information from line-of-sight measurements (Kidambi Sekar et al, 2018) of turbine response dominating over the contributions of the lateral and vertical components when the turbine is aligned with the inflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guillemin et al (2018) presented means of extracting real time 3D wind field parameters using a recursive weighted least-squares method validated with simulated pulsed lidar measurements. Kidambi Sekar et al (2018) investigated the performance of LINCOM (a fast Navier-Stokes physics-based solver) to instantaneously reconstruct the local 3D velocity components from line-of-sight measurements of a SpinnerLidar on a spherical measurement plane upstream of the rotor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is defined as the Fourier transform of the specific sampling lattice. The 1D version of this theorem is the wellknown Shannon-Nyquist theorem (Shannon, 1984). An application of this theorem to nonuniform distributed samples, like those measured by remote sensing instruments, is unfeasible due to the lack of periodicity of the sampling points.…”
Section: The Barnes Objective Analysis -Fundamentals and Extension Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. Newsom and Banta, 2004), optimal interpolation (Xu and Gong, 2002;Kongara et al, 2012), least-squares methods (Newsom et al, 2008), Navier-Stokes solvers (Astrup et al, 2017;Sekar et al, 2018) were applied for the reconstruction of the velocity vector field from dual-Doppler measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%