2016
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrw024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the intake of radon through skin from thermal water

Abstract: The biokinetics of radon in the body has previously been studied with the assumption that its absorption through the skin is negligibly small. This assumption would be acceptable except in specific situations, such as bathing in a radon hot spring where the radon concentration in thermal water is far higher than that in air. The present study focused on such a situation in order to better understand the biokinetics of radon. To mathematically express the entry of radon through the skin into the body, we first … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the Leggett et al (2013) model considers only radon inhalation and ingestion but does not consider radon transfer through the skin, Sakoda et al (2016) extended this model by an additional skin compartment, which transports radon from the water to the skin and further to the venous blood compartment. For comparison, in the earlier modeling study of Hofmann and Winkler-Heil (2010) radon was, based on the Peterman and Perkins (1988) model, directly transferred to the subcutaneous fat (fat 1) compartment without invoking a separate skin compartment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the Leggett et al (2013) model considers only radon inhalation and ingestion but does not consider radon transfer through the skin, Sakoda et al (2016) extended this model by an additional skin compartment, which transports radon from the water to the skin and further to the venous blood compartment. For comparison, in the earlier modeling study of Hofmann and Winkler-Heil (2010) radon was, based on the Peterman and Perkins (1988) model, directly transferred to the subcutaneous fat (fat 1) compartment without invoking a separate skin compartment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its much higher blood flow and fat content, the radon transfer from water to blood in the skin takes place primarily in the adipose subcutaneous tissue layer. The diffusional transport of radon from water to the dermal skin compartment is characterized by a permeability coefficient and the surface area of the skin (Sakoda et al 2016), with the stratum corneum as the rate-limiting outermost layer for the permeability (Potts and Francoeur 1990). The transfer rate from the DS to the SS compartment was adopted from the earlier modeling effort which was based on the Peterman and Perkins (1988) model (Hofmann and Winkler-Heil 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It included an enhanced photon dosimetry model, as well as models to account for air gap and cover materials for photon dosimetry and predicts beta dosimetry in shallow skin targets. 68) Recently, the uptake of radon through skin was evaluated by SAKODA et al 69) They added to the latest biokinetic model for noble gases an uptake path via the skin using the skin permeability coef cient as parameter.…”
Section: Model For Skinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar calculation procedure for thoron progeny can be referred to BI et al 123) The study on comparison of skin dose and inhalation is recently studied by SAKODA et al 69) The calculated dose conversion factors for radon and thoron progeny are practically used to assess the annual dose contributions for dwellings with earthen architecture in Germany. 124) For example in one house, it is shown the annual dose of 1 to 2 mSv from radon progeny in the upper oor and 3 to 6 mSv in the ground oor and additional 1 to 2 mSv from thoron progeny with slightly smaller values in the adjacent rooms without thoron-exhaling building material.…”
Section: (4) Dose Conversion Factormentioning
confidence: 99%