2015
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2015.2391432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Influence of Rotor Magnetic Anisotropy on Condition Monitoring of Two-Pole Induction Motors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, in past works, it was proven that the two previous evidences were not enough to confirm the presence of rotor failures in cage induction motors; this was due to the fact that there are some situations where other harmonics that are not related to the fault can be misinterpreted as fault components; these situations can lead to false positive indications [7][8][9][10][14][15]. In other cases, although the fault is present, the amplitudes of the previous components may be low or they may not be easily assessable, a fact that can lead to eventual false negative indications [8,11,13].…”
Section: Integral Methods Based On Current Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, in past works, it was proven that the two previous evidences were not enough to confirm the presence of rotor failures in cage induction motors; this was due to the fact that there are some situations where other harmonics that are not related to the fault can be misinterpreted as fault components; these situations can lead to false positive indications [7][8][9][10][14][15]. In other cases, although the fault is present, the amplitudes of the previous components may be low or they may not be easily assessable, a fact that can lead to eventual false negative indications [8,11,13].…”
Section: Integral Methods Based On Current Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…motor startup current) has been proposed. This new approach was conceived to avoid some drawbacks of MCSA, such as its eventual false diagnostic indications (either false positives or negatives) that may rise for certain motor constructive characteristics (presence of rotor cooling ducts, motors with double cage rotors, anisotropic rotor cores…) or operating conditions (load torque oscillations, no-load conditions, …) as well as its unsuitable application under varying speed conditions [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11. Visual inspection and a series of off-line tests showed that the rotor was in good condition, and the investigation presented in [15] revealed that the false alarm is produced by rotor core magnetic anisotropy. The 20 and Fig.…”
Section: B Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…6(a), to suspect a broken bar. The reason the startup test method is not influenced by the magnetic anisotropy is because the flux is distributed on the surface of the rotor at startup due to eddy current rejection of the rotor cage [15]. With the flux concentrated at the rotor surface, it is not influenced by the anisotropy of the core.…”
Section: B Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation