2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the implementation of International Classification of Diseases, 11th revision for morbidity coding: Rationale and study protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 This capability not only expedites documentation but also improves the quality and accuracy of records. Since coding diagnoses based on ICD-10 is mandatory in Iran and many other countries, 19 designing a MDS with regard to diagnostic codes is not only feasible but also of great use. 18 The most common laboratory data included in the MDS were related to hematology tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 This capability not only expedites documentation but also improves the quality and accuracy of records. Since coding diagnoses based on ICD-10 is mandatory in Iran and many other countries, 19 designing a MDS with regard to diagnostic codes is not only feasible but also of great use. 18 The most common laboratory data included in the MDS were related to hematology tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 The next class belonged to diagnosis, and included six data elements. Considering the WHO schedule for the implementation of ICD-11, as well as its pilot implementation in Iran, 44 However, in the radiology form of the Spine Tango registry, numerous data elements had been considered for registering complete details of the imaging findings. 45 For registering the treatment process data in patients with spinal canal stenosis, four data classes of physiotherapy, exercise recommendation and patient education, surgical/invasive procedures, and medication had been proposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of ICD transition, in previous studies, users faced significant challenges with minimal experience in the new and more complex coding system 20 , 21 , leading to inaccurate and unspecified coding 22 , 23 , which requires long and expensive training 24 . In ICD code selection, having too many options can be worse than having too few options, as this leads to increased inter- and intraobserver variability and improper use, especially if the system is time-consuming 25 , 26 .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%