Evaluation of the implementation of a subset of ISO/IEC 29110 Software Implementation process in four teams of undergraduate students of Ecuador. An empirical software engineering experiment

Castillo-Salinas, Luis; Sánchez-Gordón, Sandra; Villarroel-Ramos, Jorge; Sánchez‐Gordón, Mary

doi:10.1016/j.csi.2020.103430

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, they may have an issue selecting software tools and development methods which conform with the standard. Some studies Suteeca and Ramingwong, 2016;Alvarez and Hurtado, 2014;Boucher et al, 2012;Castillo-Salinas et al, 2020;Buchalcevova, 2021) present case studies on the compliance of software process standards. They also describe the pros and cons for the use of standards.…”

Section: Iso/iec 29110mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study focuses on the implementation of the ISO/IEC 29110 standard (International Organization for Standardization, 2015aStandardization, , 2015bStandardization, , 2016 in conjunction with the agile process. Although, some authors Suteeca and Ramingwong, 2016;Alvarez and Hurtado, 2014;Boucher et al, 2012;Castillo-Salinas et al, 2020;Buchalcevova, 2021) have researched the implementation of the international standard of software process i.e., ISO/IEC 29110 for software agile processes, issues and impracticality still exist. In particular, there are impracticalities with relation to Thai VSEs and their use of ISO/IEC 29110 for software agile processes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Toward traceability model between ISO/IEC 29110 artefacts and agile process

Jirapanthong

2023

SEHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the efficacy of the traceability model in the development of artefacts related to pre-defined activities in the ISO/IEC 29110 process and ones related to agile process. This efficacy is demonstrated through a study of very small entities (VSEs) in Thailand who applied a development script based on the traceability model for various software projects. Six VSEs, with their respective software development projects, participated in the study with comparable time constraints and budgets. The VSE development teams utilized the traceability model to establish connections between the artifacts of the agile process and the ISO/IEC 29110 standard. The results show the potential benefits for VSEs in the application of the traceability model in such processes and what the teams learned from their participation. Each team’s productivity differed only slightly. The average figure of productivity with the traceability model was 1.416. However, the average figure of productivity without the traceability model was 1.3045. It is found the agile process can be facilitated and less effort by applying the traceability model.

show abstract

Section: Iso/iec 29110mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward traceability model between ISO/IEC 29110 artefacts and agile process

Jirapanthong

2023

SEHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The result leads to a set of best practices from the Basic profile of ISO/IEC 29110 identifying also the difficulties and benefits of its implementation. In the EuroSPI community, given the crucial influence of late Prof. Rory O'Connor, the topic is omnipresent 4–8 . In this paper, authors analyze implementations to guide future adoptions of the standard in organizational settings.…”

Section: About the Special Issuementioning

confidence: 99%

Current perspectives on the software engineering process

Bíró

Colomo‐Palacios

Messnarz³

2020

J Software Evolu Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This volume comprises a selected set of high‐quality and extended articles of the 26th Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI) Conference, held during September 18–20, 2019 in Edinburgh, UK. Conferences were held in Dublin (Ireland) in 1994, in Vienna (Austria) in 1995, in Brighton (UK) in 1996, in Budapest (Hungary) in 1997, in Gothenburg (Sweden) in 1998, in Pori (Finland) in 1999, in Copenhagen (Denmark) in 2000, in Limerick (Ireland) in 2001, in Nuremberg (Germany) in 2002, in Graz (Austria) in 2003, in Trondheim (Norway) in 2004, in Budapest (Hungary) in 2005, in Joensuu (Finland) in 2006, in Potsdam (Germany) in 2007, in Dublin (Ireland) in 2008, in Alcala (Spain) in 2009, in Grenoble (France) in 2010, in Roskilde (Denmark) in 2011, in Vienna (Austria) in 2012, in Dundalk (Ireland) in 2013, in Luxembourg in 2014, in Ankara (Turkey) in 2015, in Graz (Austria) in 2016, in Ostrava (Czech Republic) in 2017, in Bilbao (Spain) in 2018, and in Edinburgh (UK) in 2019.

show abstract

“…x En [12] mediante un experimento controlado en cuatro equipos de estudiantes de pregrado, los autores pudieron evaluar y comparar la calidad de los procesos de desarrollo y los productos resultantes de un subconjunto del proceso de Implementación de Software (SI) del ISO/IEC TR 29110-5-1-2, e identificar si el éxito de la implementación de este proceso depende de factores como la capacitación, la planificación y el compromiso…”

Section: Trabajos Relacionadosunclassified