2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2006.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the impact of different human factor models on industrial and business processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,72 The activities include checking and correcting errors in the model, such as logic, routing, incorrect components combination, or systems errors. 6,41 54…”
Section: Rq1(v): Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,72 The activities include checking and correcting errors in the model, such as logic, routing, incorrect components combination, or systems errors. 6,41 54…”
Section: Rq1(v): Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, HF is widely perceived as uncertain, which increases the complexity of logistics processes and operations (Nilsson, 2006). This is more evident in all the activities that are directly affected by human behaviours, such as decision-making or organisational and social activities (Bruzzone et al, 2007). The few literature contributions that have investigated the topic of HF in logistics often focused on a single specific aspect (i.e., operators' safety) in internal and external logistics.…”
Section: Hf In Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an increase of the watch by two hours from four to six hours would not distinguish how much this adds to the exhaustiveness of the staff and eventually to a chance of committing a safety-related error. At large, the inclusion of human factors (Bruzzone, 2007, andWetteland, 2000) like performance shaping factors of crew staff (Kozine, 2007), some cognitive modelling, the influence of assigning a task to a crew member with a lower qualification, team work effect, and a richer set of task interactions would provide a better picture to be able to man the ship safer. Some degree of geographical awareness would also be desirable, in order for instance to properly implement the navigation through time zones, as well as some spatial awareness to better simulate the effect of the movement of crewmembers on the ship.…”
Section: Concluding Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To support making decisions based on this principle, a tool is needed that can provide an objective foundation and documentation to assess whether a ship is safely staffed. More information on the need of such a tool and optimising ship staffing is given in Bruzzone et al (2007), Wetteland et al (2000), and in Tyson (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%