2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the impact of various agricultural practices on nitrate leaching under the root zone of potato and sugar beet using the STICS soil–crop model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, nitrogen leaching is influenced by other factors such as temporal distribution and intensity of rain events, irrigation and nitrogen management or fertilizer type, which are not evaluated by the regression model [45]. However, the values computed using the regression model are in close agreement with results reported by other authors for different irrigated crops in Spain [46][47][48], with a nitrogen-leaching rate between 8% and 30% of the total nitrogen application for maize, 10%-15% for sugar beet and 35%-59% for potatoes. CWUModel has simulated a nitrogen-leaching rate of 12%-31%, 11%-17% and 30%-50% respectively.…”
Section: Limitation Of the Grey Water Footprint Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, nitrogen leaching is influenced by other factors such as temporal distribution and intensity of rain events, irrigation and nitrogen management or fertilizer type, which are not evaluated by the regression model [45]. However, the values computed using the regression model are in close agreement with results reported by other authors for different irrigated crops in Spain [46][47][48], with a nitrogen-leaching rate between 8% and 30% of the total nitrogen application for maize, 10%-15% for sugar beet and 35%-59% for potatoes. CWUModel has simulated a nitrogen-leaching rate of 12%-31%, 11%-17% and 30%-50% respectively.…”
Section: Limitation Of the Grey Water Footprint Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Although nitrate leaching in regions appears to be an inevitable process, an improvement in management practices leading to higher N fertilizer use efficiency is thought to reduce the potential for groundwater nitrate contamination. The environmental impact of agricultural pollutants depends on many different factors, such as fertilizer type, fixation, crop type, hydro-meteorological conditions (climatology and hydrogeology), crop management practices and soil characteristics [13]. Several authors have demonstrated the effect of different types of land cover on the hydrology of watersheds [14], a factor that is also directly linked to the nutrient transport within a watershed, particularly within the root zone.…”
Section: Nhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the multiple environmental processes involved in the dynamics of N, such as atmosphere deposition and pesticide and fertilizer use, mathematical modeling is extremely valuable because it can help quantify the pollution, determine balances at the watershed scale and guide decisions to improve management [13] [15]. Thus, a model-based study is required to obtain information on the environmental effects considering anthropogenic data.…”
Section: Nhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STICS was developed by the French National Institute for Agronomic Research (INRA), comprising a large multidisciplinary community of researchers, from microclimate and soils to crop sciences (Brisson, 2004). This is a generic crop model that can be applied to a wide variety of crops, such as wheat (Brisson et al, 2002;Rodriguez et al, 2004), maize (Bruckler et al, 2000;Brisson et al, 2002;Debaeke, 2004), sugarcane (Valade et al, 2014) and banana (Brisson et al, 1998) and for many other purposes such as irrigation strategies (Katerji et al, 2010), carbon balances (de Noblet-Ducoudre et al, 2004), soil drainage (Tournebize et al, 2004) and nitrate contamination (Ledoux et al, 2007;Jego et al, 2008) and climate change impact assessment (Courault and Ruget, 2001;Juin et al, 2004;Gonzalez-Camacho et al, 2008). de Cortazar-Atauri (2006) adapted this model for grapevines assessing the necessary parameterizations.…”
Section: Dynamic Crop Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%