2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2017.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Impact of Preoperative Education in Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of the included studies by type of intervention, aggregate data from the included studies by type of intervention, RoB assessment, summary of findings, excluded studies, studies that fit the inclusion criteria but had no usable data, and relevant protocols of ongoing or unpublished studies are shown in the online supplemental digital content. We identified eight types of interventions administered in the preoperative period: nutritional (51 studies),30–80 respiratory (30 interventions of 29 studies)81–109 exercise (27 studies),110–136 multimodal (25 studies),100 108 137–159 educational (17 studies),160–176 psychological (16 studies),177–192 smoking and alcohol cessation (7 studies)193–199 and pharmacological (5 studies)200–204 (table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of the included studies by type of intervention, aggregate data from the included studies by type of intervention, RoB assessment, summary of findings, excluded studies, studies that fit the inclusion criteria but had no usable data, and relevant protocols of ongoing or unpublished studies are shown in the online supplemental digital content. We identified eight types of interventions administered in the preoperative period: nutritional (51 studies),30–80 respiratory (30 interventions of 29 studies)81–109 exercise (27 studies),110–136 multimodal (25 studies),100 108 137–159 educational (17 studies),160–176 psychological (16 studies),177–192 smoking and alcohol cessation (7 studies)193–199 and pharmacological (5 studies)200–204 (table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, only three studies reported LOS outcomes with respect to this intervention, each of insufficient power to detect a difference. 110,112 Equally unexpectedly, the insertion of prophylactic drainage was not associated with increased LOS. Avoidance of unnecessary drain insertion is generally recommended 5 and the authors hypothesise that the similar LOS observed among drained and undrained patients relates to study protocols designed to compare endpoints such as pain, development of collections, and drain outputs, at standard timepoints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Three studies [110][111][112] were identified examining the effect of intensive versus standard preoperative education and none found differences in LOS or day case rate. This intervention was not amenable to meta-analysis as there were not enough studies for inclusion in either LOS or day case rate.…”
Section: Preoperative Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca bü girişimlerin hastaların semptom kontrolü ne ve o z bakımlarına katkı sag layacag ı dü şü nü lmektedir. GLK geçirecek hastalar, ameliyat o ncesi kapsamlı eg itim verildig inde evde karşılaşabilecekleri ag rı, bülantı-küsma, yara bakımı konülarında oto kontrol sag layarak kendi bakımlarını gerçekleştirebilirler ve kendilerini gü vende hissederler (26). Ameliyat Sonrası Bakım Cerrahi sonrası planlı ve kanıta dayalı hemşirelik yo netimi ile gelişebilecek pek çok komplikasyon o nlenebilmektedir (27).…”
Section: Günübi̇rli̇k Laparoskopi̇k Kolesi̇stektomi̇ Ve Bakim Ameliyat öNcesi Hasta Hazırlığıunclassified