2020
DOI: 10.1080/19376812.2020.1814826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the impact of climate change on the characteristics of drought in Sahel Region of Nigeria: 1971–2060

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…llnl.gov/cmip5/. RCP 8.5 was used for the study because its underlying assumptions are similar to the prevailing conditions in Sub-Saharan Africa, where Nigeria is located (Ogunrinde et al 2020). These assumptions are: high population growth, slow rate of economic development, and relatively slow tempo of technological change, coupled with increased greenhouse gas emission, moderate improvement rates of energy intensity and a dearth of good climate change policies (Riahi et al 2011;Ogunrinde et al 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…llnl.gov/cmip5/. RCP 8.5 was used for the study because its underlying assumptions are similar to the prevailing conditions in Sub-Saharan Africa, where Nigeria is located (Ogunrinde et al 2020). These assumptions are: high population growth, slow rate of economic development, and relatively slow tempo of technological change, coupled with increased greenhouse gas emission, moderate improvement rates of energy intensity and a dearth of good climate change policies (Riahi et al 2011;Ogunrinde et al 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RCP 8.5 was used for the study because its underlying assumptions are similar to the prevailing conditions in Sub-Saharan Africa, where Nigeria is located (Ogunrinde et al 2020). These assumptions are: high population growth, slow rate of economic development, and relatively slow tempo of technological change, coupled with increased greenhouse gas emission, moderate improvement rates of energy intensity and a dearth of good climate change policies (Riahi et al 2011;Ogunrinde et al 2020). HadGEM2-ES and IPSL-CM5A models were selected for use because they have been shown to simulate the observed climate of Nigeria well (Third National Communication of the Federal Republic of Nigeria under the UNFCC), while ICHEC-EC-EARTH was used because it is not a widely used model for climate change studies in Nigeria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies found divergence in trends of drought characteristics between SPI and SPEI in observations (Stagge et al, 2017;Karimi et al, 2020;Ionita and Nagavciuc, 2021), historical climate simulations (Chiang et al, 2021) and future climate projections (e.g. Arnell and Freeman, 2021;García-Valdecasas Ojeda et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021;Ogunrinde et al, 2021), with SPEI indicating increased drying compared to SPI. Increases in PET under a changing climate, combined with the high sensitivity of SPEI to PET changes, cause amplified projections of climatological drying and even a reversal of wetting trends in some parts of the world compared to when only changes in precipitation are considered (Cook et al, 2014).…”
Section: Differences Between Spi and Spei Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The SPI allows monitoring and analysis of meteorological drought through the transformation of aggregated rainfall data at different time scales [34]. SPI is a statistical monthly indicator (e.g., 3, 6, 12, and 24 months) that is fitted to a long-term precipitation time series using a gamma distribution function, as given by the following equation [35,36]:…”
Section: Drought Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%