Evaluation of the imaging properties of two generations of a CCD‐based system for digital chest radiography

Abstract

Two generations of a CCD-based detector system with lens-based optical coupling for digital chest radiography were evaluated in terms of presampling MTF, NPS, NEQ, DQE, linearity in response, and SNR over the detector area. Measurements were performed over a wide exposure range and at several different beam qualities. Neither the presampling MTF nor the DQE showed any general strong beam quality dependence, whereas the NPS and NEQ did when compared at specific entrance air kerma values. The exposure dependency for the DQE was found to be considerable, with the detectors showing low DQE at low exposures, and higher DQE at higher exposures. It was found that the second generation has been substantially improved compared to its predecessor regarding all the relevant parameters. The DQE(0) at an entrance air kerma of 5 microGy increased from 9% to 15%, mainly due to a better system gain (including optical coupling efficiency and matching of the energy of the emitted light photons to the sensitivity of the CCD camera). The first generation of detectors was found to have problems with bad peripheral resolution [MTF(muN/2) <0.1]. This problem was nonexistent for the second generation for which uniform resolution has been obtained [MTF(muN/2)=0.3]. A theoretical calculation of the DQE of two model systems similar to the ones evaluated was also performed, and the results were comparable to the experimentally determined data at high exposures. The model shows that both systems suffer from low optical coupling efficiency due to the large demagnification used. The main conclusion is that although the second generation has been improved, there is still a problem with low system gain leading to relatively modest DQE values, especially at low exposures.

Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography

“…5). These results have been obtained before [11,15] and seem to indicate that storage-phosphor systems are gain-noise limited, whereas CCD-based systems are additive-noise limited.…”

“…The slit images used for the MTF determinations were, however, exposed at 70 kVp because of too high X-ray penetration through the slit edges at higher tube voltages. This is not considered to influence the results significantly [11,19].…”

“…The optics have also been upgraded with a new mirror system and a new lens. See Båth et al [11] for a more thorough comparison of the two systems.…”

“…The scattered fraction (SF) can be written as (neglecting the influence of the signal): (10) which leads to a relationship between K and SF given by: (11) …”

Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system

“…It therefore follows that any images used to optimise a digital radiographic system for chest radiography must contain clinically realistic anatomical features and noise. The assessment of image quality of digital systems is typically undertaken with physical quality metrics, such as modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectra (NPS), detective quantum efficiency (DQE), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and threshold contrast measurements [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Although these parameters describe the inherent performance of the imaging detector extremely well, it is difficult to link them to clinical image quality (i.e.…”