1994
DOI: 10.1016/0307-4412(94)90175-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the hill coefficient from scatchard and klotz plots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hill coefficients were estimated as 0.55 and 0.52 for geraniol and citronellol , respectively. This indicates that the binding of geraniol and citronellol to hOR1A2 could be considered as negatively cooperative bindings 28 . Previous works show that for most GPCRs, the binding of one ligand to one binding site causes the structural change of neighboring binding sites, which may lead to a lower affinity for other ligands like our results 29 – 31 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Hill coefficients were estimated as 0.55 and 0.52 for geraniol and citronellol , respectively. This indicates that the binding of geraniol and citronellol to hOR1A2 could be considered as negatively cooperative bindings 28 . Previous works show that for most GPCRs, the binding of one ligand to one binding site causes the structural change of neighboring binding sites, which may lead to a lower affinity for other ligands like our results 29 – 31 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2 lower panel), were linear indicating no deviations from Clark's model and the single binding site n pointed out the relative high binding selectivity of the photochromes towards the biopolymer reactive sites. 12 It is worth noting that the reported values of n must be considered apparent for the following reasons: (i) the association constants are calculated by a single-site binding model, (ii) the observable physical quantity used, i.e. absorption, is proportional to the concentration (extensive variable) and not to the mole fraction (intensive variable e.g.…”
Section: Uv-vis Quantitative Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive cooperative binding results in sigmoidal MM and Klotz curves ( Figure 6A and B) and nonlinear Lineweaver-Burk (LB) plots bending upwards ( Figure 6C). [63] On the other hand, negative cooperative effect could give rise to biphasic primary curves ( Figure 6A) and nonlinear LB plots bending downwards [59,[64][65][66] (Figure 6 C). Data fitted to Equation (9) with a Hill coefficient (n) greater than or less than 1 are indicative of positive or negative cooperative effects, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive cooperative binding results in sigmoidal MM and Klotz curves (Figure 6 A & B) and non-linear Lineweaver-Burk (LB) plots bending upwards (Figure 6 C) 62 . On the other hand, negative cooperative effect could give rise to biphasic primary curves (Figure 6 A) and non-linear LB plots bending downwards 58,[63][64][65] (Figure 6 C).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%